Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Rogoff <bpr@best.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Undefined evaluation order
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 11:14:08 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010051046251.22949-100000@shell5.ba.best.com> (raw)

Hi,
    It is well known that OCaml has undefined evaluation orders and that
it uses right-to-left ordering. What is the rationale for that decision? 
I remember some discussion of this but I couldn't find it in the Caml list
archives. 

    Besides being surprising for lots of people, it is actually a little
ugly to have to write explicit let bindings to force the order and when
reading files which consist of long records; for instance I much prefer 

type date =
  { year : int
  ; month : int
  ; day : int
  ; hour : int
  ; minute : int
  ; second : int 
  }

let input_date igds =
  { year = input_word igds
  ; month = input_word igds
  ; day = input_word igds
  ; hour = input_word igds
  ; minute = input_word igds
  ; second = input_word igds
  }

to 

let input_date igds =
  let year = input_word igds in
  let month = input_word igds in
  let day = input_word igds in
  let hour = input_word igds in
  let minute = input_word igds in
  let second = input_word igds in
  {  year = year
   ; month = month
   ; day = day
   ; hour = hour
   ; minute = minute
   ; second = second
   }

or even with right-to-left where the order is exactly the opposite of the 
record definition (and of what most readers expect). 

-- Brian




             reply	other threads:[~2000-10-05 18:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-10-05 18:14 Brian Rogoff [this message]
2000-10-06  2:02 ` Ken Wakita
2000-10-06 11:18   ` Pierpaolo BERNARDI
2000-10-07  6:46     ` Ken Wakita
2000-10-08 15:43 ` David Mentré
2000-10-08 22:47   ` Brian Rogoff
2000-10-10 12:47     ` Thorsten Ohl
2000-10-10 20:52       ` Brian Rogoff
2000-10-10 19:26     ` Stefan Monnier
2000-10-09 12:45 ` Xavier Leroy
2000-10-10 12:46 Greg Morrisett
2000-10-10 18:55 John R Harrison
2000-10-10 19:23 David McClain
2000-10-11 12:22 Greg Morrisett
2000-10-11 20:35 ` Pierre Weis
2000-10-13  7:05   ` Judicael Courant
2000-10-13 14:21     ` Markus Mottl
2000-10-16  8:38       ` Christophe Raffalli
2000-10-16 15:48         ` Brian Rogoff
2000-10-16 16:29           ` Christophe Raffalli
2000-10-17  9:19             ` Ralf Treinen
2000-10-12  9:53 Dave Berry
2000-10-12 11:32 Greg Morrisett
2000-10-12 17:06 David McClain
2000-10-13 13:56 Dave Berry
2000-10-14  1:42 David McClain
2000-10-20 14:59 Gerard Huet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.BSF.4.21.0010051046251.22949-100000@shell5.ba.best.com \
    --to=bpr@best.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox