From: Brian Rogoff <bpr@best.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Undefined evaluation order
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 11:14:08 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010051046251.22949-100000@shell5.ba.best.com> (raw)
Hi,
It is well known that OCaml has undefined evaluation orders and that
it uses right-to-left ordering. What is the rationale for that decision?
I remember some discussion of this but I couldn't find it in the Caml list
archives.
Besides being surprising for lots of people, it is actually a little
ugly to have to write explicit let bindings to force the order and when
reading files which consist of long records; for instance I much prefer
type date =
{ year : int
; month : int
; day : int
; hour : int
; minute : int
; second : int
}
let input_date igds =
{ year = input_word igds
; month = input_word igds
; day = input_word igds
; hour = input_word igds
; minute = input_word igds
; second = input_word igds
}
to
let input_date igds =
let year = input_word igds in
let month = input_word igds in
let day = input_word igds in
let hour = input_word igds in
let minute = input_word igds in
let second = input_word igds in
{ year = year
; month = month
; day = day
; hour = hour
; minute = minute
; second = second
}
or even with right-to-left where the order is exactly the opposite of the
record definition (and of what most readers expect).
-- Brian
next reply other threads:[~2000-10-05 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-05 18:14 Brian Rogoff [this message]
2000-10-06 2:02 ` Ken Wakita
2000-10-06 11:18 ` Pierpaolo BERNARDI
2000-10-07 6:46 ` Ken Wakita
2000-10-08 15:43 ` David Mentré
2000-10-08 22:47 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-10-10 12:47 ` Thorsten Ohl
2000-10-10 20:52 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-10-10 19:26 ` Stefan Monnier
2000-10-09 12:45 ` Xavier Leroy
2000-10-10 12:46 Greg Morrisett
2000-10-10 18:55 John R Harrison
2000-10-10 19:23 David McClain
2000-10-11 12:22 Greg Morrisett
2000-10-11 20:35 ` Pierre Weis
2000-10-13 7:05 ` Judicael Courant
2000-10-13 14:21 ` Markus Mottl
2000-10-16 8:38 ` Christophe Raffalli
2000-10-16 15:48 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-10-16 16:29 ` Christophe Raffalli
2000-10-17 9:19 ` Ralf Treinen
2000-10-12 9:53 Dave Berry
2000-10-12 11:32 Greg Morrisett
2000-10-12 17:06 David McClain
2000-10-13 13:56 Dave Berry
2000-10-14 1:42 David McClain
2000-10-20 14:59 Gerard Huet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.BSF.4.21.0010051046251.22949-100000@shell5.ba.best.com \
--to=bpr@best.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox