From: Brian Rogoff <bpr@best.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Revised syntax question
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 09:34:28 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009250928000.5077-100000@shell5.ba.best.com> (raw)
Hi,
I have an issue with the Revised syntax (from OCaml P4, with URL
http://caml.inria.fr/camlp4/manual/camlp4023.html).
How about
do e1; e2; e3; done e4
and change while/for to be consistent with this and return a value
in done?
while e1
do e2;
done e3
for i = e1 to e2 do e3; done ()
This saves a keyword "return" and looks a bit more consistent, though
maybe a touch noisier when you don't return a value from a loop. Anyone
using Revised have a different opinion?
-- Brian
next reply other threads:[~2000-09-25 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-09-25 16:34 Brian Rogoff [this message]
2000-09-26 14:58 Gerard Huet
2000-09-26 17:15 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-09-27 5:50 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2000-09-27 9:29 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2000-09-28 4:36 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-09-28 12:01 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.BSF.4.21.0009250928000.5077-100000@shell5.ba.best.com \
--to=bpr@best.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox