From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA25647; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 19:07:34 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA25652 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 19:07:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f9AH7R108427 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 19:07:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (patrick@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.11.6/8.11.5) with SMTP id f9AH7J957027; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 13:07:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from patrick@watson.org) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 13:07:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Patrick M Doane To: bcpierce@cis.upenn.edu cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: [Caml-announce] OCamldoc In-Reply-To: <4066.1002712085@saul.cis.upenn.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Benjamin C. Pierce wrote: > I.e., *one* kind of (not very) funny comment marker, plus using the > indentation to decide whether the comment binds to the expression before > or after: > > if the comment is on a line by itself, > then if its indentation is the same as the following (non-comment) line > then it goes with the following > else it goes with the preceding > else it goes with the line it's on. This proposal looks perfect to me. I've also noticed in the manual that all of the multi-line comment examples are like this: (** line 1 line 2 line 3 *) Will there be any issues with writing comments like this? (** line 1 * line 2 * line 3 *) Patrick ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr