Re: [Caml-list] Suggestion (was: Demande clarification nomenclature ocaml*)

[Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons <Diego.FERNANDEZ_PONS@etu.upmc.fr>]

    Bonjour,

> While waiting for nested namespaces one could do namespace-by-convention. One
> would keep INRIA (or possibly something convenient and shorter) as prefix for
> INRIA OCaml stuff, leaving other useful prefixes for the normal people. This
> namespace could then be maintained in a perlish style. Reading this list from
> time to time it is quite clear that there is a number of people who mail a
> lot to this list, who know a lot about OCaml (as far as I can judge this as
> someone who knows little about OCaml), and who would be suitable for being
> maintainers of the toplevel namespace.

Je ne comprends pas votre point : je ne parle pas d'espace de noms a
l'interieur d'un langage de programmation mais de noms exterieurement
visibles. Chez nos collegues de Haskell, leurs bibliotheques
s'appellent DData, Edison, Pancito, etc. et non HaskellDataLib,
HaskellDataLib et HaskellImages.


        Diego Olivier


-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners