From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id QAA09824; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 16:36:44 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA10001 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 16:36:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from outbound28-2.lax.untd.com (outbound28-2.lax.untd.com [64.136.28.160]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i69EafSH002096 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 16:36:42 +0200 Received: from outbound28-2.lax.untd.com (smtp01.lax.untd.com [10.130.24.121]) by smtpout01.lax.untd.com with SMTP id AABAQ7MMTA2MLYC2 for (sender ); Fri, 9 Jul 2004 07:36:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 14214 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2004 14:35:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vangogh) (66.52.241.30) by smtp01.lax.untd.com with SMTP; 9 Jul 2004 14:35:40 -0000 From: "Brandon J. Van Every" To: "caml" Subject: RE: [Caml-list] tail recursion and register poor Intel architecture Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 07:45:52 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <1089356145.29648.347.camel@pelican.wigram> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal X-ContentStamp: 3:5:167355188 X-UNTD-OriginStamp: CI84cOLHFqh7Zd2QWkwvEFvwyO3T/pIsPQZphDk9MRiqC3GER5NYdkemlO0TtWoR X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 40EEAD79.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; brandon:99 caml-list:01 recursion:01 2004:99 brandon:99 caml-list:01 bayesian:01 crap:01 crap:01 implements:01 ocaml:01 wrote:03 wrote:03 tail:03 anybody:03 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk skaller wrote: > On Fri, 2004-07-09 at 09:01, Brandon J. Van Every wrote: > > by the time anybody > > actually implements what I'm talking about the P-IIIs will be mostly > > gone. > > Don't be forgetting microcontrollers! In OCaml? Cheers, www.indiegamedesign.com Brand*n Van Every S*attle, WA Praise Be to the caml-list Bayesian filter! It blesseth my postings, it is evil crap! evil crap! evil crap! ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners