From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA18652; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:47:31 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA19034 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:47:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from outbound28-2.lax.untd.com (outbound28-2.lax.untd.com [64.136.28.160]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i6D9lSSH006387 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:47:28 +0200 Received: from outbound28-2.lax.untd.com (smtp01.lax.untd.com [10.130.24.121]) by smtpout02.lax.untd.com with SMTP id AABARHM6JAXSGE9S for (sender ); Tue, 13 Jul 2004 02:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 2085 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2004 09:46:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vangogh) (66.42.36.130) by smtp01.lax.untd.com with SMTP; 13 Jul 2004 09:46:37 -0000 From: "Brandon J. Van Every" To: "caml" Subject: [Caml-list] OCaml as business model Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 02:56:51 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <9E344DAA-D4AD-11D8-B633-00039310CAE8@inria.fr> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal X-ContentStamp: 8:4:374746462 X-UNTD-OriginStamp: CI84cOLHFqh7Zd2QWkwvEFvwyO3T/pIsPQZphDk9MRijUy5n9IreBydrtD20JBwa X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 40F3AFB0.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; brandon:99 model:01 damien:01 brandon:99 caml-list:01 bayesian:01 crap:01 crap:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 off-topic:01 doligez:01 business:96 business:96 wrote:03 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Damien Doligez wrote: > Brandon J. Van Every wrote: > > > I am here to > > argue that different licenses have different consequences, and one > > should be clear what one's business and community objectives are, > > before picking a particular license. > > And that is also totally off-topic for this list. Please move this > discussion elsewhere, guys. You don't deal with OCaml business, marketing, and strategic growth issues on this list? Where would you deal with them then? Granted, other languages often have different lists to deal with these sorts of practical business concerns. But OCaml hasn't evolved to that point. Do you think nobody on this list should discuss how to popularize OCaml, in any particular application domain? Cheers, www.indiegamedesign.com Brand*n Van Every S*attle, WA Praise Be to the caml-list Bayesian filter! It blesseth my postings, it is evil crap! evil crap! evil crap! ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners