From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB9BBC69 for ; Tue, 8 May 2007 01:43:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail11.bluewin.ch (mail11.bluewin.ch [195.186.18.61]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l47Nh6PI008857 for ; Tue, 8 May 2007 01:43:06 +0200 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (85.2.6.51) by mail11.bluewin.ch (Bluewin 7.3.121) id 45F509DF00F09D61 for caml-list@inria.fr; Mon, 7 May 2007 23:43:05 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <90823c940705071526x87f78b4i74bc73b11ee9a890@mail.gmail.com> References: <90823c940705071526x87f78b4i74bc73b11ee9a890@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_B=FCnzli?= Subject: Re: [Caml-list] F# lightweight syntax for Ocaml with camlp4 - possible? Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 01:43:20 +0200 To: Caml List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 463FB98A.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; bunzli:01 buenzli:01 syntax:01 ocaml:01 camlp:01 syntax:01 parens:01 readable:01 26,:98 caml-list:01 dmitry:01 bely:01 width:97 epfl:02 confusing:02 Le 8 mai 07 =E0 00:26, Dmitry Bely a =E9crit : > I realize that the third syntax will be 'too much' but it really =20 > seems to be quite useful... In a language where you don't enclose function arguments in parens I =20 think this is really a bad idea, it makes the code more confusing =20 than readable, especially if you try to code with a line width of 80 =20 columns. Daniel=