Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Harrison, John R" <johnh@ichips.intel.com>
To: "'Mattias Waldau'" <mattias.waldau@abc.se>,
	"'Xavier Leroy'"<xavier.leroy@inria.fr>,
	"'Caml List'" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Cc: zielony@cs.net.pl, "Harrison, John R" <johnh@ichips.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Toplevel question ...
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 08:48:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <FD2423AA68A7D511A5A20002A50729E12C101B@orsmsx115.jf.intel.com> (raw)

| So, technically, it would be feasible to resurrect the Caml V3.1      
| behavior: evaluating "expr ;;" at top-level binds the result 
| value to the name "it".  Do others think that it would be useful?
                                                               
As I've said, I really like the "it" feature. It's also difficult to        
imagine anyone seriously objecting to it, given that the Caml Light

misfeature of being unable to GC objects only accessible via overwritten

toplevel bindings has been corrected. I hadn't noticed that change

before, but I'm very pleased to see it.
                                                             
| (But I think that soon people would ask you to keep all the
| lines, so that we would write it.(4) instead.)                      
                                                                     
If some more elaborate solution like that were contemplated, I'd like
an option to disable it or manually force forgetting and GC of earlier
items.
                                                          
John.
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


             reply	other threads:[~2002-03-07  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-06 16:48 Harrison, John R [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-28 15:49 Andrzej M. Ostruszka
2002-03-01  9:36 ` Tomasz Zielonka
2002-03-06 10:24 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-03-06 10:41   ` Mattias Waldau
2002-03-06 17:33   ` shiv

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=FD2423AA68A7D511A5A20002A50729E12C101B@orsmsx115.jf.intel.com \
    --to=johnh@ichips.intel.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=mattias.waldau@abc.se \
    --cc=xavier.leroy@inria.fr \
    --cc=zielony@cs.net.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox