From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 890027EE4B for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2013 16:15:49 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of amc79@cam.ac.uk) identity=pra; client-ip=131.111.8.149; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="amc79@cam.ac.uk"; x-sender="amc79@cam.ac.uk"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of amc79@cam.ac.uk) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=131.111.8.149; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="amc79@cam.ac.uk"; x-sender="amc79@cam.ac.uk"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk) identity=helo; client-ip=131.111.8.149; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="amc79@cam.ac.uk"; x-sender="postmaster@ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArIBAEpvUVKDbwiVnGdsb2JhbABZgz/BaoEoDgEBAQEBBg0JCRQogiUBAQEDAQEBATc0EAsLRicBLwYTiAAGBAiyIYkUjx46gx+BBAOVNoN6k3Y X-IPAS-Result: ArIBAEpvUVKDbwiVnGdsb2JhbABZgz/BaoEoDgEBAQEBBg0JCRQogiUBAQEDAQEBATc0EAsLRicBLwYTiAAGBAiyIYkUjx46gx+BBAOVNoN6k3Y X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,1044,1371074400"; d="scan'208";a="29277940" Received: from ppsw-mx-f.csi.cam.ac.uk (HELO ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk) ([131.111.8.149]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 06 Oct 2013 16:15:48 +0200 X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from m.cb1.com ([217.155.139.150]:34608 helo=[192.168.1.158]) by ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.159]:587) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:amc79) (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) id 1VSp7c-00085Z-7i (Exim 4.80_167-5a66dd3) for caml-list@inria.fr (return-path ); Sun, 06 Oct 2013 15:15:48 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) From: Amir Chaudhry In-Reply-To: <2646A790-46D4-4985-9AED-8E1B3C582762@cam.ac.uk> Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 15:15:52 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <2646A790-46D4-4985-9AED-8E1B3C582762@cam.ac.uk> To: caml users X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ocaml-infra] Feedback on the ocaml.org redesign and logo Dear caml-list, Just a brief reminder that I'd still like feedback on the OCaml logo and oc= aml.org redesign work (see previous message below).=20=20 I'm continuing the discussion on the infrastructure list [1] about the rede= sign and how we migrate the current site to the new design. If anyone would= like to join in please do so over there. [1] http://lists.ocaml.org/pipermail/infrastructure/2013-October/000304.html Best wishes, Amir On 24 Sep 2013, at 15:17, Amir Chaudhry wrote: > Dear all, >=20 > I've just put up a blog post asking for feedback on the ocaml.org redesig= n [1]. I'm specifically interested in getting feedback on (1) the second i= teration of the OCaml Logo and (2) the new design for ocaml.org. See the b= log post for more information. We're tracking feedback via issues [2] and = there are some known issues already listed there. >=20 > [1] http://amirchaudhry.com/ocamlorg-request-for-feedback/ > [2] https://github.com/ocamllabs/sandbox-ocaml.org/issues?state=3Dopen >=20 > Thanks, > Amir > _______________________________________________ > Infrastructure mailing list > Infrastructure@lists.ocaml.org > http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/infrastructure