From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88F8BBC6 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:20:45 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aj4DAG+d6EnRVdunmGdsb2JhbACVej8BAQEBAQgJDAcRp12BCZAaAQMBA4N6Bg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,431,1233529200"; d="scan'208";a="27872546" Received: from mail-ew0-f167.google.com ([209.85.219.167]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 18 Apr 2009 00:20:45 +0200 Received: by ewy11 with SMTP id 11so1402165ewy.9 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:20:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:references:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:cc:x-mailer; bh=LxPbnFfBA/kUc/Pwjls064FDWuX6cuoWJAv2LtiTYQk=; b=nM4Y2W7SF0bZvHlAqjEBBA9vMJT52sHbdlUy+NUA2xn+z5mLwqdu2m8FXCLz144Efz xxjDTtgMR1qIZPTfmi69slzIqK7a9DRLlD8nkJN4IluEEd0aJ4xHjWbW/QpDeeB1vU6X pThzdxFHFFtNGNUarWz1qMdrF2ZSvdYefL3vk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:cc:x-mailer; b=VJt04WrWvgxRdUiqmfZd7aM5NbDD2TMOtBJ81Pd6Ir4g423BZXTWkaUfAzSC/UR7ft Yf4i0zq/nRktirXhgjz7JScJbbhQg5mQz/cqmf0RO7U/VVw4tfrqluRm/yswiGvqkRit foSOOyxraYuLQxTT9eOUHbQk5t/AvYqBzvaLA= Received: by 10.210.126.18 with SMTP id y18mr3257572ebc.8.1240006845142; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:20:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.10.30.15? (228.Red-83-33-96.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.33.96.228]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm4249015eyg.25.2009.04.17.15.20.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:20:44 -0700 (PDT) References: <50CD0BA8-B89C-49E2-9082-FFA037F251A6@lip6.fr> <9E5A9BDB-2A67-45DC-A963-AA45B7E1693B@lip6.fr> <5409216D-4094-424B-BEEE-3AC3701A87DD@lip6.fr> Message-Id: From: Joel Reymont To: Philippe Wang In-Reply-To: <5409216D-4094-424B-BEEE-3AC3701A87DD@lip6.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] "ok with parallel threads" GC (aka ocaml for multicore) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:20:41 +0100 Cc: caml-list@inria.fr X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 threads:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 hacker:02 seems:03 aka:04 problem:05 parallel:05 apr:06 actually:10 philippe:11 but:14 ---:17 too:17 On Apr 17, 2009, at 11:15 PM, Philippe Wang wrote: > PS. We tried to switch to 3.11, but it seems to need too much time, > it's far from being a piece of cake. > We have tried to make it work on Leopard (actually, I failed the 1st > time - half the way, I may try again if I have time). What was the problem with Leopard? --- Mac hacker with a performance bent http://linkedin.com/in/joelreymont