From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA09259 for caml-red; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 23:53:53 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA13399 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 20:41:06 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from thresher.xpsystems.com ([207.171.47.5])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e5GIf5505339
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 20:41:05 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: by THRESHER with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
	id <M666W42A>; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 11:41:26 -0700
Message-ID: <EDFD2A95EE7DD31187350090279C67679AA30A@THRESHER>
From: Brent Fulgham <brent.fulgham@xpsystems.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: RE: Newsgroup for Caml?
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 11:41:19 -0700
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr

> I read all messages on the list and have no problems with its traffic.
> 
> Personally I strongly prefer mailing-lists to newsgroups.
>
I agree.  I do not have newsgroup access behind my work firewall.  E-mail
is the only way I could see CAML-list related postings.

Regards,
-Brent