From: "Daniel Bünzli" <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: OCaml Mailing List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] is there a switch or cond-statement? nested functions?
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 19:38:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EC775E65-2A7D-4A5C-9D57-8A56A5B999FC@erratique.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080903.192440.782875784647892171.Christophe.Troestler+ocaml@umh.ac.be>
Le 3 sept. 08 à 19:24, Christophe TROESTLER a écrit :
> May I suggest
[...]
3. Have a look at the the programming guidelines [1]. In particular,
this point [2] may show you a cond is not needed to make your code
nice and readable.
Best,
Daniel
[1] http://caml.inria.fr/resources/doc/guides/guidelines.en.html
[2] http://caml.inria.fr/resources/doc/guides/guidelines.en.html#id2269347
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-03 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-03 17:08 circ ular
2008-09-03 17:24 ` [Caml-list] " Christophe TROESTLER
2008-09-03 17:38 ` Daniel Bünzli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=EC775E65-2A7D-4A5C-9D57-8A56A5B999FC@erratique.ch \
--to=daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox