From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37F7BC69 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 03:04:09 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,438,1188770400"; d="scan'208";a="19479790" Received: from smtpoutm.mac.com ([17.148.16.69]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 20 Nov 2007 03:04:08 +0100 Received: from mac.com (asmtp004-s [10.150.69.67]) by smtpoutm.mac.com (Xserve/smtpout006/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id lAK247Wt025065 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:04:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.8.152] (c-24-218-151-219.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.218.151.219]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/asmtp004/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id lAK244bc013287 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:04:06 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: From: Gordon Henriksen To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: <9E586E26-29A7-487D-AFE7-BC2ADC08C96E@erratique.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml and Leopard Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:04:04 -0500 References: <100AE1A2-D155-4821-84D0-DCEDE74FE9EF@gmail.com> <8E94369C-27ED-400D-8F92-21CAEC666625@mac.com> <9E586E26-29A7-487D-AFE7-BC2ADC08C96E@erratique.ch> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 bunzli:01 segfault:01 cvs:01 wrote:01 macosx:01 compile:01 compilers:01 caml-list:01 executables:01 proceeding:01 caml:02 compiling:02 tree:02 patches:03 On 2007-11-19, at 20:42, B=FCnzli Daniel wrote: > Le 18 nov. 07 =E0 16:27, Gordon Henriksen a =E9crit : > >> This is exactly the right fix for older releases. There is work =20 >> proceeding on top-of-tree so that subsequent releases will compile =20= >> for Leopard (rather than just on it). > > Do you happen to know if it is expected that executables produced =20 > for ppc in 10.5 by compiling the compilers with =20 > MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET set to 10.4 do segfault on a 10.4 ppc ? Or =20= > did I do something wrong ? Sorry, I can't say. Especially not knowing whether you're building =20 3.10, CVS, or some other tree. I will remark that such cross-compiles do not seem to be well-tested, =20= although patches or even just analysis of your problem would likely be =20= welcomed at http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/. =97 Gordon