From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B3617F02D for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 12:19:17 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of dra-news@metastack.com) identity=pra; client-ip=62.13.148.99; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="dra-news@metastack.com"; x-sender="dra-news@metastack.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of dra-news@metastack.com designates 62.13.148.99 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=62.13.148.99; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="dra-news@metastack.com"; x-sender="dra-news@metastack.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@outmail148099.authsmtp.net) identity=helo; client-ip=62.13.148.99; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="dra-news@metastack.com"; x-sender="postmaster@outmail148099.authsmtp.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkADAF1gNlQ+DZRjnGdsb2JhbABFGoJrdlgBA7ddBpMuh00CgQgWAREBAQEBAQgUCUCEBAEBBAM3TwIBCBgKCwkQMiUCBBuINwMJN8VOhiCJczgKgyOBHgWWNYcQgWqNUoo0bAGBR4ECAQEB X-IPAS-Result: AkADAF1gNlQ+DZRjnGdsb2JhbABFGoJrdlgBA7ddBpMuh00CgQgWAREBAQEBAQgUCUCEBAEBBAM3TwIBCBgKCwkQMiUCBBuINwMJN8VOhiCJczgKgyOBHgWWNYcQgWqNUoo0bAGBR4ECAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,683,1406584800"; d="scan'208";a="100191883" Received: from outmail148099.authsmtp.net ([62.13.148.99]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 09 Oct 2014 12:19:16 +0200 Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235]) by punt18.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id s99AJG0X038520 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 11:19:16 +0100 (BST) Received: from romulus.metastack.com (cpc1-cmbg5-0-0-cust241.5-4.cable.virginm.net [81.98.252.242]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id s99AJE2m031973 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 11:19:14 +0100 (BST) Received: from remus.metastack.local (remus.metastack.com [172.16.0.1]) by romulus.metastack.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s99AJEq9011217 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 11:19:14 +0100 Received: from Remus.metastack.local ([fe80::547c:3c42:e1da:eda2]) by Remus.metastack.local ([fe80::547c:3c42:e1da:eda2%10]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 11:19:14 +0100 From: David Allsopp To: "OCaml List (caml-list@inria.fr)" Thread-Topic: [Caml-list] Bug in Scanf (Version 4.02.0) Thread-Index: AQHP46ni/J7SCy4FyUy1JWIwxxU7vZwnjQ/g Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 10:19:12 +0000 Message-ID: References: <54365FF5.6020904@free.fr> In-Reply-To: <54365FF5.6020904@free.fr> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.16.0.18] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: MetaStack Solutions Ltd. X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.65 on 172.16.0.20 X-Server-Quench: b8676a11-4f9d-11e4-b396-002590a15da7 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd1ZAARAlZZVg1f DC4bFwdFRBksPQFF ChxFJgxfNlEAUAAU NkdBMnJSNkcdTBdX QSgLUksrAxluW2N0 bxpQbA9ca0BPWkti UVZASkxQEQd2AxgD GRwbTRk8NAxPCQQF ZxtiXXFSW0c0dEF9 RwAGHWsBYzZhaX0b BkkMagJVJQdXLBxM bE1/VHEIaGVWZ380 FlAlBR1jdQZ0ISFR BwUMNk4nCWwWEXY9 QVg5FjwpEwVFeSgp NB0hLBZAWh5LdB1z WZ9Y X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633634383431.1023:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 81.98.252.242/25 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Bug in Scanf (Version 4.02.0) Gustave Nimant wrote: > Hello >=20 > could you tell me when the bug in Scanf (uncorrect behaviour of "%0c") > will be corrected ? You need to create an account for the bug tracker (http://caml.inria.fr/man= tis/) and watch the affected issues. However, you're presumably referring t= o http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=3D6531 which has been fixed and s= o will be in 4.02.1 (given that Damien explicitly mentioned it on this list= when 4.02.1 was announced). David=20