From: David Allsopp <dra-news@metastack.com>
To: Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@inria.fr>,
caml users <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] OCaml 4.04.0+beta1
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:28:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E51C5B015DBD1348A1D85763337FB6D90135073B8E@Remus.metastack.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1038B4FD-B561-413E-885A-8EAE00AC31FD@inria.fr>
Damien Doligez wrote:
> > On 2016-08-09, at 16:24, Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de> wrote:
<snip>
> > In Debian "~" is used to denote versions smaller than, e.g.
> > 4.04.0~beta1, 4.04.0~rc4 while "+" is for versions larger than, e.g.
> > 4.03.0+bugfix7. Would it be possible to adapt the same for ocaml
> > versions?
>
> No. We have a well-defined syntax for version numbers and we can't change
> it without breaking an unknown number of tools.
Wouldn't it only ever break it for alpha/beta/rc releases, though? Might that be a price worth paying (next time)?
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-11 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-09 13:15 Damien Doligez
2016-08-09 14:24 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2016-08-11 15:10 ` Damien Doligez
2016-08-11 16:28 ` David Allsopp [this message]
2016-08-12 10:47 ` Damien Doligez
2016-08-12 10:58 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2016-08-12 12:09 ` Damien Doligez
2016-08-12 12:23 ` Daniel Bünzli
2016-08-12 12:25 ` Grégoire Henry
2016-08-12 12:50 ` David Allsopp
2016-08-16 12:37 ` Damien Doligez
2016-08-16 12:44 ` Gabriel Scherer
2016-08-16 12:54 ` David Allsopp
2016-08-26 14:00 ` Louis Gesbert
2016-09-05 9:24 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2016-08-12 12:46 ` David Allsopp
2016-08-12 14:56 ` [Caml-list] Debian's version-numbering convention Hendrik Boom
2016-08-12 15:57 ` David Allsopp
2016-08-12 16:06 ` Hendrik Boom
2016-08-09 16:06 ` [Caml-list] OCaml 4.04.0+beta1 Mohamed Iguernlala
2016-08-10 16:42 ` Mohamed Iguernlala
2016-08-10 16:46 ` Anil Madhavapeddy
2016-08-12 10:09 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E51C5B015DBD1348A1D85763337FB6D90135073B8E@Remus.metastack.local \
--to=dra-news@metastack.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=damien.doligez@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox