From: Julian <chasm@rift.sytes.net>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Threaded ocaml code, native threads, and linux SMP
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 02:10:06 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1Cf7ZG-0001Vp-00@galileo.rift> (raw)
I wrote the following CPU-bound function in order to test the
Thread module in ocaml:
let rec loop pair = match pair with
(100000, 50000) -> ()
| ( i, 50000) -> loop (i+1, 0)
| ( i, j) -> loop (i, j+1) ;;
This function was used in two test programs:
* Version 1 *
let t1, t2 = Thread.create loop (0,0),
Thread.create loop (0,0) ;;
Thread.join t1;;
Thread.join t2;;
* Version 2 *
loop (0,0);
loop (0,0);;
The test programs were each compiled with the following command:
(ocaml 3.08, debian sid, linux kernel 2.6):
ocamlopt -thread -o <name> unix.cmxa threads.cmxa <name>.ml
I then tried running the two versions on an SMP machine. I found that
whereas I expected version 1 to run roughly twice as fast, they actually
took the same amount of time.
Closer inspection using "ps" revealed that only one processor was being
used. When I wrote a similar test program in C, calling the pthread
functions directly, the threads were run on separate CPUs as expected.
The "ldd" command reveals that the C version and the ocaml version were
relying on the same native pthread library.
So why doesn't the ocaml version use 2 processors?
Is it a flaw with my program?
Did I compile the program incorrectly?
Thanks for any help you can give,
Julian
next reply other threads:[~2004-12-17 2:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-17 2:10 Julian [this message]
2004-12-17 2:50 ` [Caml-list] " Kip Macy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1Cf7ZG-0001Vp-00@galileo.rift \
--to=chasm@rift.sytes.net \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox