From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97A2BCA2 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:52:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j7HEqxxw020160 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:52:59 +0200 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA23865 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:52:58 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from lion.seas.upenn.edu (LION.SEAS.upenn.edu [158.130.12.194]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j7HEqvK1020157 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:52:58 +0200 Received: from [158.130.12.234] (GRW74-1.cis.upenn.edu [158.130.12.234]) (authenticated bits=0) by lion.seas.upenn.edu (8.13.3/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j7HEqvvO026926 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:52:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1124211988.16243.17.camel@starlight.valdosta.edu> References: <1124211988.16243.17.camel@starlight.valdosta.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Alwyn Goodloe Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Software Design Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:52:55 -0400 To: jtbryant@valdosta.edu X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 43034F4B.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 43034F49.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; alwyn:01 goodloe:01 upenn:01 caml-list:01 notations:01 alwyn:01 goodloe:01 ocaml:01 caml-list:01 beginner's:01 ocaml:01 beginners:01 bug:01 2005,:98 ...:98 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 Maybe the old structured design notations such as data flow diagrams etc would be easier to adapt to FP than UML. Just a thought since it mainly dealt with functions and tying them together. Just my two cents. Alwyn Goodloe On Aug 16, 2005, at 1:06 PM, Jonathan Bryant wrote: > I'm not trying to bring up a subject that we have already beat to > death, > so I'll keep my focus narrow :). > > Is there an equivalent of UML for functional languages? Or is it > maybe > possible to use UML in some specific way to denote functional > concepts? > I know that OCaml supports OO programming, but this is specific to the > non-OO paradigm... > > --Jonathan > > -- > *=========================* > |Jonathan Bryant | > |Valdosta State University| > |Information Technology | > |System Operations | > |-------------------------| > |jtbryant@valdosta.edu | > |x6358 | > *=========================* > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs >