From: Ross Duncan <ross.duncan@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
To: caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Conditional Modules
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 12:23:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D3659702-E6D1-11D8-97DB-000A95C61840@comlab.ox.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d849ad2a040804094559770a34@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks to everyone who replied to my plea for help. Unfortunately I
don't believe that any of the very good suggestions I received will
solve my problem. As John Prevost said:
> (And that's the real reason
> that you can't do conditionals to choose one of several modules: you
> can't do conditionals at runtime on types!)
If I had specified my problem a little more carefully I might have said
module type T =
sig
type t
(* some other stuff involving t *)
end
module M1 : T = ....
module M2 : T = ....
(* and now choose at runtime between M1 and M2 *)
It seems that all the *other stuff* can be chosen at runtime with
various degrees of elegance but the type t is the big spanner which
stops the machine.
So I guess my request for help should now become a feature request for
the language! Is this at all compatible with static typing?
Thanks again for all the suggestions.
Ross
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-05 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-04 14:58 Ross Duncan
2004-08-04 16:02 ` Richard Jones
2004-08-04 16:29 ` Michel Mauny
2004-08-04 16:45 ` John Prevost
2004-08-04 17:22 ` Shivkumar Chandrasekaran
2004-08-05 11:23 ` Ross Duncan [this message]
2004-08-05 12:34 ` Alain Frisch
2004-08-05 15:10 ` Jean-Baptiste Rouquier
2004-08-05 15:54 ` Christophe Raffalli
2004-08-06 7:53 ` Alain Frisch
2004-08-04 17:23 ` henri dubois-ferriere
2004-08-04 17:24 ` james woodyatt
2004-08-04 18:01 ` John Prevost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D3659702-E6D1-11D8-97DB-000A95C61840@comlab.ox.ac.uk \
--to=ross.duncan@comlab.ox.ac.uk \
--cc=caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox