From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7160CBC48 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:36:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from parmail02.sgcib.com (parmail02.sgcib.com [207.45.250.34]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j37CaTrl011949 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:36:29 +0200 X-IronPort-AV: i="3.92,83,1112565600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="7421255:sNHT47278496" Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C53B6E.6AE20CB1" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Subject: Reverting ocamlc and ocamlopt library generation Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:36:27 +0200 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Reverting ocamlc and ocamlopt library generation Thread-Index: AcU7bnnEaxefkaT9EdmF6QAQtY90HA== From: "EL-CHAAR Rabih" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Apr 2005 12:36:28.0205 (UTC) FILETIME=[6B44F5D0:01C53B6E] X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4255294D.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocamlc:01 ocamlopt:01 caml-list:01 ocamlopt:01 cmxa:01 compilation:01 situtation:01 cmxa:01 lib:01 lib:01 cmx:01 -cclib:01 -dllib:01 ocaml:01 ocamlc:01 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C53B6E.6AE20CB1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello everyone, some days ago, a message on the caml-list was sent regarding that ocamlopt = complains that cmxa are not compilation units. After having responded off the list to the person, it seems that he is faci= ng the following situtation: He is in the present of external cmxa libraries, let's say lib1.cmxa and li= b2.cmxa. The goal is to create a library lib.cmxa containing the code of lib1.cmxa l= ib2.cmxa and some personal file.cmx. A solution could be to compile the personal files into one library lib_.cmx= a , and use the three libraries in conjunction. My question is the following : Is the process of creating cma from cmos and cmas as well as cmxa from cmxs= too complicated. Compared to the ar equivalent with .obj, is there any additional sugar, exc= ept options passed through -cclib -dllib ?? If it's not the case, isn't there a simple way to reverse engineer the libr= ary creation process ?? It can be of some interest to be able to scatter lib1.cmxa into the corresp= onding cmx's used during the creation. I've looked a little bit throught the ocaml manual, and didn't find anythin= g explaining this phase and the feasability of reverting it. Thanks in advance for your replies. Rabih Chaar ************************************************************************* Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont confidentiels et etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisee est interdite. Tout message electronique est susceptible d'alteration. SG Asset Management et ses filiales declinent toute responsabilite au titre= de ce message s'il a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Decouvrez l'offre et les services de SG Asset Management sur le site www.sgam.fr ******** This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and inten= ded solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited.=20 E-mails are susceptible to alteration.=20 Neither SG Asset Management nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates shall= be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified.=20 ************************************************************************* ------_=_NextPart_001_01C53B6E.6AE20CB1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reverting ocamlc and ocamlopt library generation

Hello everyone,
some days ago, a message on the caml-list= was sent regarding that ocamlopt complains that cmxa are not compilation u= nits.

After having responded off the list to the= person, it seems that he is facing the following situtation:

He is in the present of external cmxa libr= aries, let's say lib1.cmxa and lib2.cmxa.

The goal is to create a library lib.cmxa c= ontaining the code of lib1.cmxa lib2.cmxa and some personal file.cmx.
A solution could be to compile the person= al files into one library lib_.cmxa , and use the three libraries in conjun= ction.

My question is the following :
Is the process of creating cma from cmos = and cmas as well as cmxa from cmxs too complicated.
Compared to the ar equivalent with .obj, = is there any additional sugar, except options passed through -cclib -dllib = ??

If it's not the case, isn't there a simple= way to reverse engineer the library creation process ??

It can be of some interest to be able to s= catter lib1.cmxa into the corresponding cmx's used during the creation.
I've looked a little bit throught the oca= ml manual, and didn't find anything explaining this phase and the feasabili= ty of reverting it.

Thanks in advance for your replies.

Rabih Chaar



************************************************************************* Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont
confidentiels et etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires.
Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisee est interdite.
Tout message electronique est susceptible d'alteration.
SG Asset Management et ses filiales declinent toute responsabilite au titre= de ce message s'il a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie.

Decouvrez l'offre et les services de SG Asset Management sur le site
www.sgam.fr

********

This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and inten= ded solely for the addressees.
Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited.
E-mails are susceptible to alteration.
Neither SG Asset Management nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates shall= be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified.

************************************************************************* ------_=_NextPart_001_01C53B6E.6AE20CB1--