From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6707DBC0B for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:48:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp20.orange.fr (smtp20.orange.fr [193.252.22.29]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBSNmjmG007886 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:48:46 +0100 Received: from [86.203.230.107] (ALagny-154-1-71-107.w86-203.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.203.230.107]) by mwinf2013.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id ACAA11C00089; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:48:45 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20061228234845707.ACAA11C00089@mwinf2013.orange.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) In-Reply-To: <20061229095241.1305d379.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> References: <6ACFD6F8-754C-4631-8C11-C8889BE144A9@lrde.epita.fr> <20061229095241.1305d379.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Qu=F4c_Peyrot?= Subject: Re: [Caml-list] compiling wxocaml (and wxhaskell) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:48:46 -0800 To: ocaml_beginners@yahoogroups.com, caml-list@inria.fr X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 459457DE.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; lrde:01 ocaml:01 wxwindows:01 bindings:01 ocaml:01 bindings:01 lablgtk:01 platform's:01 28,:98 despair:98 wrote:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 compiling:02 native:02 On Dec 28, 2006, at 2:52 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Qu=F4c Peyrot wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I was trying to find a good portable GUI library for my ocaml =20 >> projects. >> A natural choice seemed to be wxwindows/wxWidgets since I wanted >> to have a native look'n feel and QT doesn't have any bindings in =20 >> OCaml >> (to my despair... anyone working on QT bindings?) > > Have you looked at lablgtk? I find it up to date and easy to use. Yes I have and it was ok, but it doesn't use native platform's controls. --=20 Best Regards, Qu=F4c