From: Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
To: Francois BERENGER <francois.c.berenger@vanderbilt.edu>
Cc: OCaml Mailing List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] where are we on the Hoogle for OCaml front?
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 12:58:04 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CC4FFB55-E373-4764-9AAB-19488A29A5D8@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <416beaa2-9430-20fe-d8fa-e9f02761378f@vanderbilt.edu>
For search by type signature you can use Jun Furuse's OCamlOScope:
https://camlspotter.github.io/ocamloscope.html
It also gives documentation when available.
I'm not sure how big the database is.
Jacques
On 2017/01/28 01:39, Francois BERENGER wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Do we have a hoogle[1] equivalent that is in production for OCaml?
>
> I mean something that would index all source code available in opam
> and allow queries by type signature or keyword?
>
> Currently, I use ocp-browser but I still feel like
> it's a temporary and not super efficient measure.
>
> I don't know how to do query by type signature with it.
> And many packages don't install their doc so you cannot
> see the doc for each function.
> At list for the stdlib it works (inside ocp-browser you type List.map then spacebar, for example).
>
> When I was an Haskell programmer (for two months, a long time ago), I felt Hoogle was the biggest productivity enhancer (you don't reinvent
> the wheel, just find which one you need and use it).
>
> Regards,
> F.
>
> [1] https://www.haskell.org/hoogle/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-04 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-27 14:22 [Caml-list] FroCoS 2017 - 2nd Call for Papers Geoff Sutcliffe
2017-01-27 16:39 ` [Caml-list] where are we on the Hoogle for OCaml front? Francois BERENGER
2017-02-04 3:58 ` Jacques Garrigue [this message]
2017-02-06 14:35 ` Francois BERENGER
2017-02-06 15:46 ` Daniel Bünzli
2017-02-06 14:02 ` Hendrik Boom
2017-02-06 16:00 ` Daniel Bünzli
2017-02-06 16:07 ` Ivan Gotovchits
2017-02-06 16:11 ` Ivan Gotovchits
2017-02-06 16:34 ` Daniel Bünzli
2017-02-06 16:46 ` Ivan Gotovchits
2017-02-06 16:55 ` Frédéric Bour
2017-02-06 16:01 ` Ivan Gotovchits
2017-02-06 16:06 ` Daniel Bünzli
2017-02-06 17:46 ` Francois BERENGER
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CC4FFB55-E373-4764-9AAB-19488A29A5D8@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp \
--to=garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=francois.c.berenger@vanderbilt.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox