From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24751820A3 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:10:15 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of p.donadeo@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.216.179; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="p.donadeo@gmail.com"; x-sender="p.donadeo@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of p.donadeo@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.179 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.216.179; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="p.donadeo@gmail.com"; x-sender="p.donadeo@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-qc0-f179.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.216.179; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="p.donadeo@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-qc0-f179.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhECAJZ4MFLRVdizjWdsb2JhbABbhBGDKr82gRQIFg4BAQEBBwsLCRIGJIIlAQEFIx0BGx4DDAYFCw0CAiYCAiEBAREBBQEcBhOHbwEDD6ZMjABRgweEIwoZJw1kiCYBBQyBHYtTgnWCaYE0A5YQgWmMP4NKGCmETDo X-IPAS-Result: AhECAJZ4MFLRVdizjWdsb2JhbABbhBGDKr82gRQIFg4BAQEBBwsLCRIGJIIlAQEFIx0BGx4DDAYFCw0CAiYCAiEBAREBBQEcBhOHbwEDD6ZMjABRgweEIwoZJw1kiCYBBQyBHYtTgnWCaYE0A5YQgWmMP4NKGCmETDo X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,884,1371074400"; d="scan'208";a="26497614" Received: from mail-qc0-f179.google.com ([209.85.216.179]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 11 Sep 2013 16:10:14 +0200 Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id l4so5249279qcv.38 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 07:10:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=FzlfspYseMblPWRGSm2NrvxjZIC5Evr+ri9YFq+GltQ=; b=od+FBwjKQhKYnlaUQjWsaDeeSJKGNEyeeI5wE2aTSxUuQXhtjYBh7b6xy6P5ePVcfv aPSyvXT1BDJkebc16EExEHbybPukvbhQcqVG/vpm6WEcMYx+UF7wzl0e3ldVBn649WcY egDbQ1SVp56qMA6YfK/XTEV+aUvOkNU45DusDv2F8yI7Lehu5LOF4ZI83lxC03G2K4Gi E7fnkpXpaa3GYEaq6bS9XyT3L3a1ofBs10zK1QIb249yAytvLMLOzTgn3H33XB9Epum1 XKo0zh7dcj7nO5zuW+5CYR3hEfTdPB955N9l7+iuKdI7sVe847p2dNb8TIxtr6UgIgPt EDHg== X-Received: by 10.49.39.161 with SMTP id q1mr3637457qek.66.1378908611771; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 07:10:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.81.7 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 07:09:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20130910230928.2d51cd39@atmarama.noip.me> <20130911052437.GA9514@notk.org> From: Paolo Donadeo Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:09:31 +0200 Message-ID: To: OCaml mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml vs Ada and/or GUI options On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Kakadu wrote: > When we have discussed it in IRC, Adrien usually says "GTK doesn't > look like ugly, your theme do" :) Yes, maybe this is the real reason but... my theme is the Ubuntu default theme, and I use Ubuntu... I'm a bit ashamed to say this... I use Ubuntu mainly because the default look and feel of Debian would be great if we were in the '80s... but in 2013... So, maybe it's a matter of bad themes, but if nobody can design a decent theme, there should be a good reason :) -- Paolo