From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D40897EE51 for ; Mon, 27 May 2013 14:57:24 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of p.donadeo@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.214.179; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="p.donadeo@gmail.com"; x-sender="p.donadeo@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of p.donadeo@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.179 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.214.179; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="p.donadeo@gmail.com"; x-sender="p.donadeo@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-ob0-f179.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.214.179; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="p.donadeo@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-ob0-f179.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgkCADBXo1HRVdazk2dsb2JhbABahnO+SX0IFg4BAQEBBwsLCRQEJIIjAQEEASMdARseAwELBgUEAQY3AgIiAREBBQEcBhMUh2YBAwkGoE2LcE+CfYQlChknDAFYiAwBBQyPGIJBgRMDlzuPWxYphDc6 X-IPAS-Result: AgkCADBXo1HRVdazk2dsb2JhbABahnO+SX0IFg4BAQEBBwsLCRQEJIIjAQEEASMdARseAwELBgUEAQY3AgIiAREBBQEcBhMUh2YBAwkGoE2LcE+CfYQlChknDAFYiAwBBQyPGIJBgRMDlzuPWxYphDc6 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,751,1363129200"; d="scan'208";a="19131059" Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com ([209.85.214.179]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 27 May 2013 14:57:24 +0200 Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id wo10so4420206obc.24 for ; Mon, 27 May 2013 05:57:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=8xMpHQJeWDDC0opJRJRu88n0iW9OVONlNS91mZUxvPE=; b=VvjN2ZmsaIjDv6RGZkg7b83BVVPukY+bQN/JLCc3vxTw+ND5oA5C0Mkxq2ld8DF3oH HFWLCZ0By3HMKUQ+np2/GtxCEC5Rx/x4b9hVhdlBVQ3pyNVMCFZ5eV77kpKP04gZw7Wu xqy/5Or2o3HZTURqzb4oSLAVgdEiriefXaxNVpro33LEaPpcRVlV/oAhMIoF2IaCFR79 pIE2HipzzrlW7bFerua5fT1vYhyzdQTwrj/AMcatFfVG822GErQLwIzu5aeBXO8NR4mz LGeOY9pWQ5DcLjYMvZOXf4K9mcvV8i16hr5V2LXafKylJIPUJpZlZwLAPzIqY/GJW+5q /7dQ== X-Received: by 10.60.121.33 with SMTP id lh1mr17741072oeb.98.1369659443120; Mon, 27 May 2013 05:57:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.76.26.44 with HTTP; Mon, 27 May 2013 05:56:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51A353BE.5030009@freenet.de> References: <20130523235355.GI6510@siouxsie> <20130526150008.GA2014@siouxsie> <20130526234911.41866xca7wgoirfb@webmail.in-berlin.de> <51A30E01.5070300@freenet.de> <20130527185345.e01a7733ac652f89f4e400f7@mega-nerd.com> <51A353BE.5030009@freenet.de> From: Paolo Donadeo Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 14:56:43 +0200 Message-ID: To: OCaml mailing list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b33d004920f2b04ddb2b040 Subject: Re: Problems to get larger user base ... (Re: [Caml-list] OCaml's variables) --047d7b33d004920f2b04ddb2b040 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Mr. Herr wrote: > Scheme is even a better example for the problems non university learners > encounter, > than Ocaml, IMO. > Your point of view is rather supporting mine. > So, the problem with OCaml is the attitude of OCamlers in using precise and contextual terminology? Let's adopt PHP jargon! YEAH! ;-) OCaml has been the first functional language I learned. Alone, without a teacher, and the new (to me), precise, lexicon of this community (in contrast with the OO/Java vocabulary I was used to) is exactly one of the best values of the language. Just my 2 =C2=A2 in a rather pointless discussion ;-) --=20 *Paolo* --047d7b33d004920f2b04ddb2b040 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:38 PM= , Mr. Herr <misterherr@freenet.de> wrote:
Scheme is even = a better example for the problems non university learners encounter,
than Ocaml, IMO.
Your point of view is rather supporting mine.

S= o, the problem with OCaml is the attitude of OCamlers in using precise and = contextual terminology?

Let's adopt PHP jargon! YEAH! ;-)

<= /div>
OCaml has been the first functional languag= e I learned. Alone, without a teacher, and the new (to me), precise, lexico= n of this community (in contrast with the OO/Java vocabulary I was used to)= is exactly one of the best values of the language.

Just my 2 =C2=A2 in a rather pointless discu= ssion ;-)


--
Pa= olo
--047d7b33d004920f2b04ddb2b040--