From: Markus Mottl <markus.mottl@gmail.com>
To: OCaml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: [Caml-list] Status of Flambda in OCaml 4.03
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 17:10:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP_800qWG6ZB-6an2axntKXG2aJEjAFmPie7-U1CYz73-_qz+A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
I'm trying out OCaml 4.03.0+beta1 right now and wanted to test Flambda
optimizations. But looking at the generated assembly, it doesn't seem
to be doing much if anything on the simple test examples that I
thought would benefit.
To give an example of what I expected to see, lets consider this code:
-----
let map_pair f (x, y) = f x, f y
let succ x = x + 1
let map_pair_succ1 pair = map_pair succ pair
let map_pair_succ2 (x, y) = succ x, succ y
-----
I would have thought that the "succ" function would be inlined in
"map_pair_succ1" as the compiler would do for "map_pair_succ2".
But the generated code looks like this:
-----
L101:
movq %rax, %rdi
movq %rdi, 8(%rsp)
movq %rbx, (%rsp)
movq 8(%rbx), %rax
movq (%rdi), %rsi
movq %rdi, %rbx
call *%rsi
L102:
movq %rax, 16(%rsp)
movq (%rsp), %rax
movq (%rax), %rax
movq 8(%rsp), %rbx
movq (%rbx), %rdi
call *%rdi
-----
Is Flambda supposed to work out of the box with the current beta?
What flags or annotations should I use for testing? Any showcase
examples I should try out that are expected to be improved?
Regards,
Markus
--
Markus Mottl http://www.ocaml.info markus.mottl@gmail.com
next reply other threads:[~2016-03-08 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-08 22:10 Markus Mottl [this message]
2016-03-08 22:53 ` Alain Frisch
2016-03-09 3:55 ` Markus Mottl
2016-03-09 7:14 ` Mark Shinwell
2016-03-10 0:59 ` Markus Mottl
2016-03-10 1:32 ` Yotam Barnoy
2016-03-10 1:43 ` Markus Mottl
2016-03-10 7:20 ` Mark Shinwell
2016-03-10 15:32 ` Markus Mottl
2016-03-10 15:49 ` Gabriel Scherer
2016-04-17 8:43 ` Jesper Louis Andersen
2016-04-17 8:59 ` Mohamed Iguernlala
2016-04-17 15:43 ` Markus Mottl
2016-03-10 20:12 ` [Caml-list] <DKIM> " Pierre Chambart
2016-03-10 21:08 ` Markus Mottl
2016-03-10 22:51 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2016-03-11 8:59 ` Mark Shinwell
2016-03-11 9:05 ` Mark Shinwell
2016-03-11 9:09 ` Alain Frisch
2016-03-11 9:26 ` Mark Shinwell
2016-03-11 14:48 ` Yotam Barnoy
2016-03-11 15:09 ` Jesper Louis Andersen
2016-03-11 16:58 ` Markus Mottl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAP_800qWG6ZB-6an2axntKXG2aJEjAFmPie7-U1CYz73-_qz+A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=markus.mottl@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox