From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <markus.mottl@gmail.com>
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C652F820A1
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Sun,  8 Sep 2013 03:59:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  markus.mottl@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=74.125.82.44;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="markus.mottl@gmail.com";
  x-sender="markus.mottl@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  markus.mottl@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.44 as permitted
  sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.125.82.44;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="markus.mottl@gmail.com";
  x-sender="markus.mottl@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-wg0-f44.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=74.125.82.44;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="markus.mottl@gmail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-wg0-f44.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aj4CANHYK1JKfVIsk2dsb2JhbABagz9FDIJjAb8lgR0IFg4BAQEBBwsLCRQEJIIlAQEFQAEUBx0BAwwGBQsNLiEBAREBBQEcBhMbh1QBAw+qG4xRgwWDWgoZJw1kiBEBBQyNBoJuB4QdA5YMgWmMN4NGGCmEZCA
X-IPAS-Result: Aj4CANHYK1JKfVIsk2dsb2JhbABagz9FDIJjAb8lgR0IFg4BAQEBBwsLCRQEJIIlAQEFQAEUBx0BAwwGBQsNLiEBAREBBQEcBhMbh1QBAw+qG4xRgwWDWgoZJw1kiBEBBQyNBoJuB4QdA5YMgWmMN4NGGCmEZCA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,862,1371074400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="31935674"
Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 08 Sep 2013 03:59:20 +0200
Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b12so3009443wgh.11
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Sat, 07 Sep 2013 18:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=ouKaKFBCVQPygwVGSf1o3nIRnUaAChG/IFdFnFVSZhE=;
        b=wmUgdHB0H46dDsZNZq94tPqWTC89d6xZwyYzU1XkO8+mRfjsDtB5FxA+zGOrYMzH7c
         FZVOdIHCOGhm1lti8Gy4CKvcWN6c9WmVXMNXK9g1uALOZ8brDUaqn823rUZ44+zT4rLh
         6FbLjJ5v3Tx5Wu+13PKya/D9tML2zjZTyXvbIq91FcQazhxjB/JL6fA5Ma/kTnc+9CJf
         m3n7KeIo22XAdCMpqPgB6YZW0ufjgcQN8Tk4IgFOXtS4qli7jL+Hwk8H00wXyoi5BjO1
         LB0lttwLVRYLp3WqEHbOsAjF+7FwXK2nR76ryHPHOnTmmYovsAiKo1vY11mPQL0pW/Zu
         umhA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.109.68 with SMTP id hq4mr7741403wjb.12.1378605561040;
 Sat, 07 Sep 2013 18:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.172.4 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Sep 2013 18:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <522B9DAB.8010704@gmail.com>
References: <5229DEF9.7040706@inria.fr>
	<522A0336.7030203@inria.fr>
	<87hadw1m42.fsf@gmail.com>
	<522B9DAB.8010704@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 21:59:20 -0400
Message-ID: <CAP_800q9zd+TfVYb9ye=g1mXsbL9n-5yReKeH6D=xa-g36TEGg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Markus Mottl <markus.mottl@gmail.com>
To: Jacques-Pascal Deplaix <jp.deplaix@gmail.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Accelerating compilation

On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Jacques-Pascal Deplaix
<jp.deplaix@gmail.com> wrote:
> Personally, I'd prefer the second solution because the former will not do
> anything during the first build (if I'm not wrong) and this is quite
> problematic for end user (for installation).

I actually prefer the first solution.  You can always ship
distributions including the file storing the dependency cache.

-- 
Markus Mottl        http://www.ocaml.info        markus.mottl@gmail.com