Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] Batteries 2.1

[Gabriel Scherer <gabriel.scherer@gmail.com>]

I don't think Batteries needs bisect to compile -- I regularly build
Batteries on systems without bisect. That should be an optional
dependency (using for testing and development purposes), but it's
fairly possible that the buildsystem displays a not-nice warning when
it's missing that you considered an error.

On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Florent Monnier
<monnier.florent@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2013/07/18, Edgar Friendly wrote:
>> It's been a while since 2.0, and batteries has had a bunch of improvements
>> that should be shared with a wider audience.
>>
>> More features, more bugfixes, more batteries.
>>
>> Thanks to the *many* contributors in this release; batteries exists because
>> of you.
>
> Seems like the Batteries need bisect to compile.
> bisect-1.3 does not compile out of the box under Cygwin with protz ocaml.
>
> It would be nice if Batteries would be available for beginners using MS/Windows.
> In particular because some people recommand Batteries as a starting
> point lib for beginning.
>
> --
> Cheers
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs