From: Gabriel Scherer <gabriel.scherer@gmail.com>
To: Marek Kubica <marek@xivilization.net>
Cc: Malcolm Matalka <mmatalka@gmail.com>, Caml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] slacko-0.9.0
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2014 17:23:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPFanBF80Z4ohJngE_BwoLLNs6RopYXHJTWjz=nADgruOG=Q8A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141004165458.4efce446@xivilization.net>
Re. the "validate" function, you can do it using the ability to
pattern-match on a named subset of the polymorphic variants.
Let's consider a simplification of your problem with only two classes
of errors (taken from your code):
type error_cant_kick = [
| `Cant_kick_from_general
| `Cant_kick_from_last_channel
| `Cant_kick_self
]
type error_cant_invite = [
| `Cant_invite
| `Cant_invite_self
]
type 'a error = [
| `Success of 'a
| error_cant_kick
| error_cant_invite
]
The `validate` function indeed processes all cases, returning an
everything-possible error type:
let validate : _ -> _ error = function
| `String "cant_invite_self" -> `Cant_invite_self
| `String "cant_invite" -> `Cant_invite
| `String "cant_kick_self" -> `Cant_kick_self
| `String "cant_kick_from_general" -> `Cant_kick_from_general
| `String "cant_kick_from_last_channel" -> `Cant_kick_from_last_channel
But you can refine its result if you know (from the informal
API specification) that it can only be some subset, using the #foo
syntax. In the example below, `kick` and `invite` have been refined
with distinct subsets:
let api_mismatch err =
failwith ("API mismatch: unexpected error " (*^ to_string err *))
let kick f =
f ()
|> validate
|> function
| `Success v -> `Success v
| #error_cant_kick as err -> err
| other -> api_mismatch other
let invite f =
f ()
|> validate
|> function
| `Success v -> `Success v
| #error_cant_invite as err -> err
| other -> api_mismatch other
`kick` now returns a [> error_cant_kick | `Success of 'a ], while `invite`
returns [> error_cant_invite | `Success of 'a ].
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Marek Kubica <marek@xivilization.net> wrote:
> Hello Malcolm,
>
> Thanks for looking into my code.
>
> On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 13:36:43 +0000
> Malcolm Matalka <mmatalka@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I would either change the 'apierror' type to normal variants, or
>> spread out the apierror to multiple types. Can every API function
>> really return every one of those errors? The value of polymorphic
>> variants is they are module, and you can share the constructors
>> across types.
>
> You're right, there is a common set of errors that most functions return
> and then there are some specific errors.
>
> Originally I didn't want to create such a huge type but have every
> function have its own polymorphic variants that apply to it, so users
> of the API know exactly what errors might be thrown and have to handle
> these. The huge type is a direct result of the "validate" function
> <https://github.com/Leonidas-from-XIV/slacko/blob/bc6be47cca8d2088d3d7cfb9af0603a350ab0215/src/slacko.ml#L79>
> which tests all cases.
>
> I tried specifying a smaller subset of polymorphic variants, but the
> compiler always selected the full set. I don't know how to fix this,
> because on the one hand side I don't want to have a big monolithic
> error type but on the other hand, I don't want to duplicate a subset of
> the validate function in every function.
>
> Looking forward for ideas on how to solve this in a more elegant way.
>
>> I would also structure the API calls in terms of the Result.t type in
>> Core. Right now success is part of the error type.
>
> If I understand you correctly, this should do the trick with the
> current code:
>
> type result = Success of Yojson.Basic.json | Error of apierror
>
> For future releases I plan to replace the strings in the signatures
> with proper types (so, some "string" turn into a "token" types, others
> into timestamp types) and to process the resulting JSON into some more
> convenient data structures. But for now, I hope to get the error
> handling right and then build upon this.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> regards,
> Marek
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-04 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-04 13:05 Marek Kubica
2014-10-04 13:36 ` Malcolm Matalka
2014-10-04 14:54 ` Marek Kubica
2014-10-04 15:23 ` Gabriel Scherer [this message]
2014-10-04 22:43 ` Marek Kubica
2014-10-05 2:23 ` Jacques Garrigue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPFanBF80Z4ohJngE_BwoLLNs6RopYXHJTWjz=nADgruOG=Q8A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=gabriel.scherer@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=marek@xivilization.net \
--cc=mmatalka@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox