From: Gabriel Scherer <gabriel.scherer@gmail.com>
To: Adrien Nader <adrien@notk.org>
Cc: "Olaf Hering" <olaf@aepfle.de>,
"Daniel Bünzli" <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>,
"caml users" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OASIS circular dependency in xml-light
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 11:19:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPFanBEUfykeujqSpz7qJtdyjFJNNNqCV=wZQNQQH2fmFAcuPQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPFanBGHVwcg1Uua4Z8TXGM2MScL9OUhbY9Dgr8=x+-D-La0NQ@mail.gmail.com>
I sent a preliminary pull request to break the cycles at
https://github.com/ncannasse/xml-light/pull/3
Any comments are welcome, but we could move the discussion to this pull request.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Gabriel Scherer
<gabriel.scherer@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have the same memories of tricky circular dependencies from looking
> at the xml-light sources a while ago, and if I remember correctly
> there were some really shady Obj.magic going on at the same time. If
> people depend on this library, the best fix is probably to clean it up
> in these respects.
>
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Adrien Nader <adrien@notk.org> wrote:
>> Well, it has seen some development in the past couple years on github.
>>
>> Anyway, back to the original problem.
>>
>> xml.ml references Dtd
>> dtd.ml references Xml (through 'open Xml', which is needed)
>>
>> xml.mli does not reference Dtd
>> dtd.mli references Xml
>>
>> Currently xml.mli is compiled, then dtd.mli, then dtd.ml and finally
>> xml.ml (there are other modules involved but they don't seem to be
>> involved in the loop). I'm not completely surprised this works but I
>> didn't know it was possible (my current version here is 4.01.0 but it
>> has probably been that way for a long time). Maybe someone else can
>> comment on that.
>>
>> I'm actually wondering how this works wrt module initialization order.
>>
>> I think the sure way would be to move at least some declarations to a
>> separate module that has no dependency on others and which both Xml and
>> Dtd could depend on.
>>
>> --
>> Adrien Nader
>>
>> --
>> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives:
>> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
>> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
>> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-11 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-10 8:39 Olaf Hering
2016-06-10 10:32 ` Daniel Bünzli
2016-06-10 10:37 ` Olaf Hering
2016-06-11 6:14 ` Adrien Nader
2016-06-11 8:20 ` Adrien Nader
2016-06-11 12:03 ` Gabriel Scherer
2016-06-11 15:19 ` Gabriel Scherer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPFanBEUfykeujqSpz7qJtdyjFJNNNqCV=wZQNQQH2fmFAcuPQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=gabriel.scherer@gmail.com \
--cc=adrien@notk.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch \
--cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox