From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C4EC7ED7A for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 18:11:01 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of camaradetux@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.214.182; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="camaradetux@gmail.com"; x-sender="camaradetux@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of camaradetux@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.182 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.214.182; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="camaradetux@gmail.com"; x-sender="camaradetux@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-ob0-f182.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.214.182; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="camaradetux@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-ob0-f182.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmoCADUENVDRVda2kGdsb2JhbABFuUgDdggiAQEBAQkJDQcUBCOCIAEBAQQSAiwBGx0BAwwGBQsNLiEBAREBBQEcBhMih1sBAwyaIQkDjCKCcoVYChknDVeIcQEFDIoZY4EohXQDjXSGC4FTiw2DKT6EBA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,808,1336341600"; d="scan'208";a="170538050" Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com ([209.85.214.182]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 22 Aug 2012 18:11:00 +0200 Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id un3so2870065obb.27 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:11:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=pKPYoRyIidecCxr8o2kbXcZiCoE/QuOJXjLuPIrTDvg=; b=UAV6v2gMQXEnljaRQIiDMABw7HKhqxeik2AFjA+MFp+MvA0K9dcOc1nKx0WFdo0A3T i8LAy/EFyV/MO2XAUMJxDZK4El9gN+TWeYc+1FsoO2il8W/HufiuOc8ppnrr9wj7qagH e0YOHdGqhy/1LK6Zt0yyZvwkZB4c6tYvXZv2SWMXo/jIoeP4aBM38TpwddFXYUlEtid2 3ZUak4qe3XBpRH6+Ix/N+WTUXKXbnXfcL83COIL8XRBQEwAN0qqmGvvqOe7a8renZ8U+ ISAN+fPHKg9U8Xs9SepW2KnzgnHUBwWktxbTxY5uHWJJog1rCvVWMETMnTyiUEZrHUSx oS0g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.19.168 with SMTP id g8mr16440748oee.134.1345651860271; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:11:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.2.13 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:11:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1345583974.2210.8@samsung> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 18:11:00 +0200 Message-ID: From: Adrien To: Anthony Tavener Cc: caml-list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] What is the meaning behind the "labl" prefix? On 22/08/2012, Anthony Tavener wrote: > That's a very sensible naming. Then evolution takes hold. ;) Thanks for the > history! As far as I'm concerned, I've chosen "lablwebkit" simply because there was already "lablgtk". I could have gone for "lablgtk(2)-webkit" too but it's longer. :P Oh, and except lablsoup at some point in the future. :D (although, this one is so ugly that I might think about it again) -- Adrien Nader