That sounded totally reasonable, but is not the cause. When I think about
it, it cannot work that way, since the linker should have complained about
a missing symbol, right?

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Nicolás Ojeda Bär <
nicolas.ojeda.bar@lexifi.com> wrote:

> Hi Christoph,
>
> I can't check now, but it sounds like you forgot to link $(ocamlc
> -where)/std_exit.o into your executable.
>
> Cheers!
> Nicolas
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Christoph Höger <
> christoph.hoeger@celeraone.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I managed to manually link and run an object file generated by ocamlopt.
>> A small part seems to be missing, however:
>>
>> ➜  llvmlink ocamlfind opt -package ANSITerminal -linkpkg -verbose
>> -output-obj -o test.object.o test.ml
>>
>> ➜  llvmlink clang -I$(ocamlc -where) -lm wrapper.c test.object.o -o
>> wrapper ~/.opam/4.04.0/lib/ocaml/libunix.a -ldl
>> ~/.opam/4.04.0/lib/ocaml/libasmrun.a /home/choeger/.opam/4.04.0/lib
>> /ANSITerminal/libANSITerminal_stubs.a
>>
>> These commands produce an executable output, but the screen remains
>> empty. This changes, when I manually flush the stdout buffer in the code (I
>> obtain the desired results then).
>>
>> Find attached the test sources. When I uncomment the Printf.printf in
>> test.ml, everything seems to work fine. But when I compile the test
>> using ocamlopt solely, this is not necessary. It seems some buffers do not
>> get flushed here. Does anyone know, why?
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Christoph
>>
>>
>