From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F9927EDC2 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:53:22 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of gildor478@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.223.182; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="gildor478@gmail.com"; x-sender="gildor478@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of gildor478@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.182 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.223.182; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="gildor478@gmail.com"; x-sender="gildor478@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-ie0-f182.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.223.182; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="gildor478@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-ie0-f182.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ar0CAMNRq1DRVd+2kWdsb2JhbABFwk8IIwEBAQEJCQ0HEimCFVABOQMNBQgBB10SAQUBIogOAwEOC55mgm+OIYEKhUQnDYVJhAUBAQQMkRoDkksDgy6OYhYpgViCOg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.83,284,1352070000"; d="scan'208";a="182298560" Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com ([209.85.223.182]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 20 Nov 2012 10:53:21 +0100 Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id s9so2895654iec.27 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 01:53:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=OtPMNGItdFHO/pPkmzSfHwa3BERaIZ+fiNzlddb+ahE=; b=tXMQLX+hq3hpq3HyEeJsL0B1MmcNUHNr3gHIT/ccJ4xIfzOHsMZ9Vkplhb4TR+OEND kvbwcDZAZyF3XpOzuWU79wDVTqDDV2mVnlCdNU5L2a8JHe9CqsSA3Guo9y4C0Lxzo4Dn FQGlSNEMiJZZHP5mXYdlqs7D0TfzPhGAzoBcOQtnFXn/P/GoWV/a9/VWtuacs6PmM8rP 0T3lurlf5lgYBIC0BUxKTcsqszKlSfbuaFDxuCf3Fxa4DzUSGFyRVTKRnEf7PQL1LKtT lLi7YNzKmHU+aS8rejkJxyMyRBURIzlNxPR48//o87wbvGs0Nor+HINxsURw4v5+TAHi YqxQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.36.200 with SMTP id s8mr3787871igj.23.1353405200395; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 01:53:20 -0800 (PST) Sender: gildor478@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.52.105 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 01:53:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:53:20 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: FtNpQY0XSbn9MbasI9wyGV5Ht6w Message-ID: From: Sylvain Le Gall To: caml-list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae934082734eefe04ceea348e Subject: [Caml-list] Poll results of OASIS, package manager and misc. --14dae934082734eefe04ceea348e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello, You can see the result here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/gform?key=0AnHn-aw3eaotdE1jM1JSTGdHVV8wTWZxenV4cEkwVlE&gridId=0#chart The outcome for package manager is pretty obvious, oasis-db should focus on OPAM as a package manager. This is now on my todo list, Concerning build system: - ocamlbuild is first (60%) - native Makefile is second (40%) So I'll probably focus on this two build systems, which represents at least 70% of what people need (the 3rd build system is less than 30%). Cheers Sylvain Le Gall --14dae934082734eefe04ceea348e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello,

You can see the result here:

The outcome for package manager is pretty obvious= , oasis-db should focus on OPAM as a package manager. This is now on my tod= o list,

Concerning build system:
- ocaml= build is first (60%)
- native Makefile is second (40%)

So I'll= probably focus on this two build systems, which represents at least 70% of= what people need (the 3rd build system is less than 30%).

Cheers
Sylvain Le Gall
--14dae934082734eefe04ceea348e--