Hi Junsong,

It's possible that you have a package installed that has no version compatible with sexplib 113.24. You can try to explicitly upgrade sexplib to see what solution opam suggests

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Junsong Li <ljs.darkfish@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Jeremie,

I have 4.02.1 OCaml installed on my Mac. opam update; opam upgrade
didn't upgrade the sexplib to 113.24. opam list still shows 113.00.
Any ideas?

My fresh installed 4.02.3 OCaml on a Linux machine has 113.24 sexplib though.

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:36 AM, Jeremie Dimino <jdimino@janestreet.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 7:20 PM, ygrek <ygrek@autistici.org> wrote:
>>
>> I wonder if keeping empty sexplib.syntax subpackage with only
>> requires="pa_sexp_conv" line
>> will prevent build breakage (one will only need to fix opam dependencies)?
>
>
> That would work for now. However, sooner or latter some change in
>
> sexplib will break the code generated by pa_sexp_conv and we'll have the
> same problem again.
> The current forced upgrade is simple (one sed command [1]) and it's a hint
> that it's a good time to switch to ppx. We published a tool to help with
> this BTW [2]
>
>  [1] https://github.com/ocaml/opam-repository/blob/master/CHANGES.md
>  [2] https://blogs.janestreet.com/converting-a-code-base-from-camlp4-to-ppx
>
> https://github.com/janestreet/camlp4-to-ppx
>
> --
> Jeremie



--
Jeremie