From: Jeremie Dimino <jdimino@janestreet.com>
To: Yaron Minsky <yminsky@janestreet.com>
Cc: Malcolm Matalka <mmatalka@gmail.com>,
Yotam Barnoy <yotambarnoy@gmail.com>,
Jesper Louis Andersen <jesper.louis.andersen@gmail.com>,
Ocaml Mailing List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Question about Lwt/Async
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:03:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANhEzE6-rA3AVCs1MD2DaXp33+9==Cv-2DAdaB0EL5_sKPcidQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACLX4jSfEUpVfnX2zknKb8mY+wrD8tdnL8=UszbVV9GYnMTMYw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 798 bytes --]
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Yaron Minsky <yminsky@janestreet.com>
wrote:
> Jeremie, other than having some different back-ends available (e.g., glib
> main loop), how different are the approaches to backend management between
> Async and Lwt?
>
The backend interfaces are slightly different, but we just need a bit of
glue in the middle. Essentially the difference is that with Lwt you provide
one callback per fd and watch (read or write), while with Async you have a
global callback.
Right now what we need to change in Async to make this work is:
- allow to provide a backend programmatically; right now you can only
choose between the predefined epoll and select ones
- make the scheduler ignore fds returned by the backend that are not
handled by async
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1756 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-08 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-07 1:38 Yotam Barnoy
2016-03-07 7:16 ` Malcolm Matalka
2016-03-07 9:08 ` Simon Cruanes
2016-03-07 14:06 ` Yotam Barnoy
2016-03-07 14:25 ` Ashish Agarwal
2016-03-07 14:55 ` rudi.grinberg
2016-03-07 14:59 ` Ivan Gotovchits
2016-03-07 15:05 ` Ivan Gotovchits
2016-03-08 6:55 ` Milan Stanojević
2016-03-08 10:54 ` Jeremie Dimino
2016-03-07 15:16 ` Jesper Louis Andersen
2016-03-07 17:03 ` Yaron Minsky
2016-03-07 18:16 ` Malcolm Matalka
2016-03-07 18:41 ` Yaron Minsky
2016-03-07 20:06 ` Malcolm Matalka
2016-03-07 21:54 ` Yotam Barnoy
2016-03-08 6:56 ` Malcolm Matalka
2016-03-08 7:46 ` Adrien Nader
2016-03-08 11:04 ` Jeremie Dimino
2016-03-08 12:47 ` Yaron Minsky
2016-03-08 13:03 ` Jeremie Dimino [this message]
2016-03-09 7:35 ` Malcolm Matalka
2016-03-09 10:23 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2016-03-09 14:37 ` Malcolm Matalka
2016-03-09 17:27 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2016-03-08 9:41 ` Francois Berenger
2016-03-11 13:21 ` François Bobot
2016-03-11 15:22 ` Yaron Minsky
2016-03-11 16:15 ` François Bobot
2016-03-11 17:49 ` Yaron Minsky
2016-03-08 5:59 ` Milan Stanojević
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANhEzE6-rA3AVCs1MD2DaXp33+9==Cv-2DAdaB0EL5_sKPcidQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jdimino@janestreet.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=jesper.louis.andersen@gmail.com \
--cc=mmatalka@gmail.com \
--cc=yminsky@janestreet.com \
--cc=yotambarnoy@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox