From: Anthony Tavener <anthony.tavener@gmail.com>
To: "Daniel Bünzli" <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
Cc: caml list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Stability of order between polymorphic variants
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 20:06:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN=ouMR37Wszt1GT_t3+joaPkS9A1cQB8ONkwB86SfFVF3RkEA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EB3B4FB66B1C49E89F3B56664559EFA1@erratique.ch>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1260 bytes --]
I haven't looked at how the compare happens for polyvariants, but I assume
it's going to treat them as integers. And the integer value of the
polymorphic variants is a simple hashing-type function (byterun/hash.c:
caml_hash_variant). A multiplication by 223 is involved for each character
of the variant name, so with a long enough name, compared to the integer
size, you'll get wraparound. The short names you have there are okay.
I'd be uncomfortable relying on this ordering, but I can imagine it would
make some things a lot simpler...
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Daniel Bünzli
<daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have this type
>
> type weight = [ `W100 | `W200 | `W300 | `W400 | `W500 | `W600 | `W700 |
> `W800 | `W900 ]
>
> In the current compiler it has the property that `Wx00 < `Wy00 if x < y.
>
> The question is, is the order between polymorphic variants an invariant
> provided by the compiler or is it subject to change ?
>
> Best,
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1925 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-05 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-05 0:17 Daniel Bünzli
2013-09-05 2:06 ` Anthony Tavener [this message]
2013-09-05 2:11 ` Anthony Tavener
2013-09-05 2:18 ` Francois Berenger
2013-09-05 2:31 ` Anthony Tavener
2013-09-05 7:47 ` Stéphane Glondu
2013-09-05 8:24 ` Jacques Garrigue
2013-09-05 8:39 ` Mark Shinwell
2013-09-05 9:26 ` Jeremy Yallop
2013-09-05 14:46 ` Goswin von Brederlow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAN=ouMR37Wszt1GT_t3+joaPkS9A1cQB8ONkwB86SfFVF3RkEA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=anthony.tavener@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox