From: Anthony Tavener <anthony.tavener@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Fwd: [Caml-list] Nested module exposing type from parent?
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 15:14:41 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN=ouMQ_xUULV5qWnRR93DOK9t+juor5RA-72-4zu783z_K2tg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN=ouMS9rqqNR3KgCBnnjC_HcMrUnftVw643mkmhC_vrpXfv1A@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3580 bytes --]
Oops, I didn't do a group-reply... so in case anyone is interested in what
I ended up with:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Anthony Tavener <anthony.tavener@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Nested module exposing type from parent?
To: Vincent Aravantinos <vincent.aravantinos@gmail.com>
Actually, better than I initially thought...
I keep this as I have them defined already, except as you said: include
instead of open.
module Vec = struct
module Type = struct
type t = { x: int; y: int }
end
include Type
let make x y = {x;y}
let add a b = {x=a.x+b.x; y=a.y+b.y}
end
Before, I had instead of the include:
type t = Type.t
open Type
Which worked, but then the type used everywhere was Vec.Type.t
Thanks again! Simple and effective, and I was looking in all the wrong
places. :)
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Anthony Tavener
<anthony.tavener@gmail.com>wrote:
> Thank-you Vincent!
>
> Though this requires a home for the "source type" module, at least the
> types come out right in the end. Thanks!
>
> And this led me to read specifically about include to understand what it
> really does. :)
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Vincent Aravantinos <
> vincent.aravantinos@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> **
>> Using "include" instead of "open" would work, ie. turning your example
>> into:
>>
>> module Vec_main = struct
>>
>> type t = { x: int; y: int }
>> let make x y = {x;y}
>> let add a b = {x=a.x+b.x; y=a.y+b.y}
>> end
>>
>> module Vec = struct
>> include Vec_main
>> module Type = struct
>> include Vec_main
>> ...
>> end
>> end
>>
>> Then:
>> # let n = Vec.make 2 5;;
>> val n : Vec.t = {Vec.x = 2; Vec.y = 5}
>> # open Vec.Type;;
>> # let m = {x=1;y=2};;
>> val m : Vec.Type.t = {x = 1; y = 2}
>> # Vec.add m n;;
>> - : Vec.t = {Vec.x = 3; Vec.y = 7}
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> --
>> Vincent Aravantinos - Postdoctoral Fellow, Concordia University, Hardware Verification Group
>>
>>
>> On 11/02/2011 03:41 PM, Anthony Tavener wrote:
>>
>> I've been struggling with this occasionally...
>>
>> I'm using nested modules to "open" access to select features of a
>> module. My problem is I can't find a way to *expose* types in the parent
>> module through such nested modules.
>>
>> A simplified example of what I'm looking at:
>>
>> module Vec = struct
>>
>> type t = { x: int; y: int }
>> let make x y = {x;y}
>> let add a b = {x=a.x+b.x; y=a.y+b.y}
>>
>> module Type =
>> (* something which has type t = Vec.t,
>> * with exposed structure when "open"ed.
>> * Also note that Vec is not really an
>> * explicit module like this; instead it
>> * is implemented in vec.ml *)
>> end
>>
>> Example usage...
>>
>> let n = Vec.make 2 5
>> open Vec.Type
>> let m = {x=1;y=2}
>> Vec.add m n
>>
>>
>> To date, I've defined the type in the Type submodule, which is then
>> used by the parent module. The unsatisfactory quality of this is that
>> Vec.Type.t is the "true" type. Ideally the concrete type would live at
>> Vec.t, with "open Vec.Type" bringing the fields of the type into scope.
>>
>> As background, here are examples of opening different features of the
>> Vec module:
>>
>> let c = Vec.add a b
>>
>> open Vec.Prefixed
>> let c = vadd a b
>>
>> open Vec.Ops
>> let c = a +| b
>>
>> open Vec.Type
>> let c = Vec.add a {x;y;z=0.}
>>
>> Apologies if this is really beginner-list material. It's minor, but has
>> been bugging me.
>> Thank-you for looking,
>>
>> Tony
>>
>>
>>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6332 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-02 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-02 19:41 Anthony Tavener
2011-11-02 20:19 ` Vincent Aravantinos
[not found] ` <CAN=ouMTApZjpU-CaZtdL4njXtmtRu++7fzJBJL3w3FRcHfjtSA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAN=ouMS9rqqNR3KgCBnnjC_HcMrUnftVw643mkmhC_vrpXfv1A@mail.gmail.com>
2011-11-02 21:14 ` Anthony Tavener [this message]
2011-11-02 23:01 ` Gabriel Scherer
2011-11-03 0:06 ` Vincent Aravantinos
2011-11-03 1:03 ` Anthony Tavener
2011-11-03 0:41 ` Martin Jambon
2011-11-03 1:04 ` Anthony Tavener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAN=ouMQ_xUULV5qWnRR93DOK9t+juor5RA-72-4zu783z_K2tg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=anthony.tavener@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox