Thanks for pointing me to the previous effort, Gabriel. Some of that material could probably be reproduced in ocaml.org's wiki, though the proposed projects obviously need to be updated. Do we know why we were rejected in 2011? Was the ideas page just not completed in time, or is it just a case of being rejected without being told why? On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Gabriel Scherer wrote: > Thanks for starting this discussion. > > I've been considering the idea of preparing an OCaml GSoC application > for Summer 2016. (It's too early to tell but I'm considering > volunteering as a mentor for 2016, while I already know very well that > this would be impossible for 2015.) > > The previous effort led by Sylvain Le Gall and Cristophe Troestler was > in 2011. You can find what they collected here: > > https://forge.ocamlcore.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/gsoc-team/index.php/Main_Page > > I will try to collect some nice GSoC ideas for OCaml and add them to > the wiki page. > > On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Yotam Barnoy > wrote: > > I believe the way it works (though I could be wrong) is that an > open-source > > organization that signs up is supposed to have projects that concerns its > > codebase or related components. That means either the toolchain or some > > related tool like a debugger or perhaps something like Merlin. Perhaps it > > could even extend to a library that can be shown to be extremely useful > to > > the community -- something like Lwt or Batteries. > > > > It would be harder to make the case for something that's purely an > > application on top of OCaml, though I do believe that is possible once an > > organization is more established with GSoC, for example Xen getting > Mirage > > into GSoC -- Anil would probably know more about that kind of thing. > > > > Again, I could be wrong about this, so if anyone has better information, > > please correct me. > > > > On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Ashish Agarwal > > wrote: > >> > >> What you've written implies that all projects should regard the OCaml > >> compiler itself. Is that the intention? Or could this support projects > using > >> the OCaml language for other purposes? What other purposes? General > tools of > >> use to the OCaml community, or just anything that happens to be > implemented > >> in OCaml. > >> > >> Thanks for providing a place to collect these ideas. > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Yotam Barnoy > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hey everyone > >>> > >>> Another year has gone by, and Google Summer of Code is upon us again. > >>> Unfortunately, it doesn't seem like we're ready to participate this > year > >>> either (sign up dates for mentoring organizations are Feb 9th to the > 20th). > >>> After seeing some comments on reddit, I have taken the liberty of > >>> establishing 2 pages on the ocaml.org wiki: > >>> > >>> - GSoC ideas (https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml.org/wiki/GSoC-ideas): > this > >>> is a list of ideas for projects that students could do. It needs to be > >>> filled up and then maintained, so that by next year at least, we > actually > >>> have something to show google. > >>> > >>> - GSoC Application > >>> (https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml.org/wiki/GSoC-application): a hastily > filled > >>> out application covering the questions google expects answered. This > should > >>> also be maintained so that it's pretty much ready to go. > >>> > >>> Please fill out these pages as much as you can -- particularly the > ideas > >>> page. I haven't listed any project ideas myself, but I tried to write > some > >>> guidelines for the kinds of things that could be used as projects. > >>> > >>> -Yotam > >> > >> > > >