That's... actually a really neat idea! Sure, it would need a parsing hack to work (same as land, lxor etc), but having an operator as light as haskell's dot (.) would be awesome! And do you ever use o as a variable? We could check if anything on opam uses o. I'd seriously be up for it myself.

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Ian Zimmerman <itz@buug.org> wrote:

On 2015-10-10 20:19 -0400, Yotam Barnoy wrote:

> I definitely agree that we need a standardized composition operator. It's
> so much nicer to have one in the standard library rather than having to
> define our own. I personally use |- but I would be open to anything of
> equal length.

What's wrong with SML's "o"?

:-P

--
Please *no* private copies of mailing list or newsgroup messages.
Rule 420: All persons more than eight miles high to leave the court.

--
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives:
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs