That's... actually a really neat idea! Sure, it would need a parsing hack
to work (same as land, lxor etc), but having an operator as light as
haskell's dot (.) would be awesome! And do you ever use o as a variable? We
could check if anything on opam uses o. I'd seriously be up for it myself.

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Ian Zimmerman <itz@buug.org> wrote:

> On 2015-10-10 20:19 -0400, Yotam Barnoy wrote:
>
> > I definitely agree that we need a standardized composition operator. It's
> > so much nicer to have one in the standard library rather than having to
> > define our own. I personally use |- but I would be open to anything of
> > equal length.
>
> What's wrong with SML's "o"?
>
> :-P
>
> --
> Please *no* private copies of mailing list or newsgroup messages.
> Rule 420: All persons more than eight miles high to leave the court.
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>