Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yotam Barnoy <yotambarnoy@gmail.com>
To: Ocaml Mailing List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: [Caml-list] Default methods for module signatures
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:49:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN6ygO=F1VMSEB1QoBv8U+f0QgQk3wA4RTrc91gnV4f5Gwc9QA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1045 bytes --]

Hello List

I would like the following feature, and I'm not enough of an expert in
module-fu to know if something like this is doable.

Suppose I have a module signature of

module type Monad = sig
  type 'a m
  val return : 'a -> 'a m
  val (>>=) : 'a m -> ('a -> 'b m) -> 'b m
  val (>>) : 'a m -> 'b m -> 'b m
end

I would like to have a default implementation for (>>), since a simple
default implementation is

let (>>) m f = m >>= fun _ -> f

Alternatively, I would like to include this from some DefaultMonad module,
but have the (>>=) referred to in the function be my newly defined (>>=)
implementation (ie. late binding). Is there currently any way to do this?
If not, would there be a way to implement a partial default implementation
built into or associated with a module signature? Something like

module type Monad = sig... default struct... end

Haskell has this available as part of the semantics of their typeclass
system, and I think it would be really handy to have (if there isn't
already a way to do it currently).

-Yotam

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1636 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2014-02-05 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-05 18:49 Yotam Barnoy [this message]
2014-02-05 19:43 ` Martin Jambon
2014-02-05 20:03   ` Yotam Barnoy
2014-02-05 20:10   ` Martin Jambon
2014-02-05 19:53 ` Pippijn van Steenhoven
2014-02-05 20:29 ` Alain Frisch
2014-02-05 21:17   ` Yotam Barnoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAN6ygO=F1VMSEB1QoBv8U+f0QgQk3wA4RTrc91gnV4f5Gwc9QA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=yotambarnoy@gmail.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox