On 09/27/2013 11:55 AM, David MENTRE wrote:I haven't seen a document comparing the goals of both directly, but individually each project stated differing goals:
Hello,
2013/9/27 Paolo Donadeo <p.donadeo@gmail.com>:
But, regarding the specific case of the
"extended library", there aren't many libraries, but only two:
Batteries and Core. And I think both of them have very strong points,
and the design is quite different.
Is there a short document somewhere explaining those design differences?
- Batteries aims to be a compatible _extension_ of stdlib (so minimal or no changes required for code already using stdlib)
- Core is an incompatible _replacement_ for stdlib, aiming to take the greatest advantage of the type system (existing code would have to be updated to use Core's API)
--
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives:
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs