From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 059B07EE63 for ; Fri, 24 May 2013 11:02:20 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of arnaud.spiwack@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=74.125.82.49; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="arnaud.spiwack@gmail.com"; x-sender="arnaud.spiwack@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of arnaud.spiwack@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.49 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.125.82.49; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="arnaud.spiwack@gmail.com"; x-sender="arnaud.spiwack@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-wg0-f49.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=74.125.82.49; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="arnaud.spiwack@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-wg0-f49.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvcEABcsn1FKfVIxjWdsb2JhbABZgziDO6xHiWaINgMBeQgWDgEBAQEHCwsJEgYkgiMBAQQBIx0BEhsLAQMBCwEFBQQBBhodAgIiEgEFAQoSBhMSh2kDCQYMnACLcINMhSInAwqIZAEFDI46U4JMgRMDlzuBKY4yFimBXYJaOg X-IPAS-Result: AvcEABcsn1FKfVIxjWdsb2JhbABZgziDO6xHiWaINgMBeQgWDgEBAQEHCwsJEgYkgiMBAQQBIx0BEhsLAQMBCwEFBQQBBhodAgIiEgEFAQoSBhMSh2kDCQYMnACLcINMhSInAwqIZAEFDI46U4JMgRMDlzuBKY4yFimBXYJaOg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,734,1363129200"; d="scan'208";a="15548541" Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 24 May 2013 11:02:19 +0200 Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id y10so2507381wgg.4 for ; Fri, 24 May 2013 02:02:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=MTaHExmVPFUPjKpSE45p66jygNrg+6Z6x+Xrpxf1IrM=; b=TyM+7l+k5DEY77lLFcAGDzKt+rBrlZGspjX4n9Rqv0Cmq5ycdF7yjUcGVO44+1+gF7 53wbx840VOVAGpLnd9YwCw5rHS46q/ZieBkwzEb2Lx082+9k2Z2CNr67JSyfKB6gCYQN Js5PmrvhCJOt5z0bW6mkSRrPpHbTX47PdaR9cr8VhfcCX8Cp9aRu6V31Znnxisp+0qie h/KLB8khR0rw3RmRzuM4V+GcBv/FS3oTJTiwwOHZKz9ZOOA+OzN3fg34BzMlDs58QhH6 lQGYWmS3kD19rtAWrJhAgF0YCtE3I0Ikldvb6PSrRc5/wAYsiyabJoqllo14TwALVoL6 IwWA== X-Received: by 10.180.205.200 with SMTP id li8mr31747241wic.15.1369386139181; Fri, 24 May 2013 02:02:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: arnaud.spiwack@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.57.131 with HTTP; Fri, 24 May 2013 02:01:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130523235355.GI6510@siouxsie> References: <20130523235355.GI6510@siouxsie> From: Arnaud Spiwack Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 11:01:39 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: IdNE9bvuHxc5ZI8gNXiT3vzpiwk Message-ID: To: oliver Cc: OCaML Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c382c662e6f904dd730e02 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml's variables --001a11c382c662e6f904dd730e02 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Why were you astounded? This is a perfectly legitimate/correct use of the word "variable". On 24 May 2013 01:53, oliver wrote: > Hi, > > I was astouned to find the term "variables" in the Reference Manual for > OCaml 4.00. > > Found that on page 136 in the sentence with "(...) statically constructive > (...)". > > Did not checked, if this is on other pages also. > To tired to check it, and to tired/lazy for a bugreport now... > ...but thought it might be something that might better be corrected. > > > Ciao, > Oliver > > -- > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: > https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs > > --001a11c382c662e6f904dd730e02 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Why were you astounded? This is a perfectly legitimate/cor= rect use of the word "variable".


On 24 May 2013 01:53, oliver <oliver@first.in-berlin.de> wrote:
Hi,

I was astouned to find the term "variables" in the Reference Manu= al for
OCaml 4.00.

Found that on page 136 in the sentence with "(...) statically construc= tive (...)".

Did not checked, if this is on other pages also.
To tired to check it, and to tired/lazy for a bugreport now...
...but thought it might be something that might better be corrected.


Ciao,
=C2=A0 =C2=A0Oliver

--
Caml-list mailing list. =C2=A0Subscription management and archives:
ht= tps://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs


--001a11c382c662e6f904dd730e02--