From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p65II3tC023390 for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 20:18:03 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgcDAApUE07RVdg2kGdsb2JhbAA9AQMSmROObggUAQEBAQkJDQcUBCGubIwmgkyEMTmIaAIDBoYwBIc5in2MIzyDXA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,481,1304287200"; d="scan'208";a="86653370" Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com ([209.85.216.54]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 05 Jul 2011 20:17:57 +0200 Received: by qwc9 with SMTP id 9so5270524qwc.27 for ; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 11:17:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=zkonevUvCYS7uhnQKRM1tzPf4kN07Or/eFAgworCcRU=; b=Ocq2Oto1VIxDHK1tEoTkziokhxjCAXz1Bl0szyRXH2BSCOwO1RlnFjzK1KePxy+6qi 6Rl7xWP9RSfgbfigpb2CT+YjntyF6sKXTJXvHkMYGGcKswnH9OV5piUgJmsRnltfBRzp B3flPl0NHSoMbrswS6erV+7Z+RtQbiooQCsN8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.41.70 with SMTP id n6mr5656656qce.237.1309889876160; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 11:17:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.237.149 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 11:17:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110705180620.GC23789@yeeloong.happyleptic.org> References: <4E133C2F.6050202@soton.ac.uk> <4E134A89.7070307@inria.fr> <20110705180620.GC23789@yeeloong.happyleptic.org> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 22:17:56 +0400 Message-ID: From: Dmitry Bely To: caml-list@inria.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Nested callbacks? On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:06 PM, wrote: >> file freelist.c; line 397 ### Assertion failed: prev < bp || prev == Fl_head > > I stumbled upon this one when using threads on a program of mine some > time ago on ARM arch (but not others). Do you run your code on ARM by > any chance? No, it's x86. - Dmitry Bely