From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p6690KJg024727
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 11:00:20 +0200
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlcDABYjFE7RVdg2kGdsb2JhbAA9AQMSmRiOYwgUAQEBAQkJDQcUBCGwOYwpgkyEajmIaAIDBoYwBIdAiwGMJzyDXg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,485,1304287200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="98063367"
Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com ([209.85.216.54])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 06 Jul 2011 11:00:14 +0200
Received: by qwc9 with SMTP id 9so5735402qwc.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 02:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=rjfdgib14xlieVLGP7w6G/hbvxezqRwRfSkgJLHzxH0=;
        b=bb0xBCPDeNGorp55bGgzm8VZ7ac18E9E4oH1UUscWwWCrn5L9USClZMYRjMoCvR83p
         phpcF2NzFuagFydTtkOH3r7yWFgniUWzAFJuAKd/3Yu/8Wg4zFlxAOPS4vH28XBoY8V1
         nDFD6Z3WLc3iRYA7rzbWIMCOqqn4bVGXmKDUA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.79.20 with SMTP id n20mr6134417qck.275.1309942813411; Wed,
 06 Jul 2011 02:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.237.149 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 02:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMT7qiSCqf8ekU5aoY0EXyKGLzsG+DsGt3w1q9RCr5hqWHdoRw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMT7qiTE_z_5xVviNfu95AH3s8HmnOv7JHCLpSGMHZFZyYeDow@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E133C2F.6050202@soton.ac.uk>
	<4E134A89.7070307@inria.fr>
	<CAMT7qiSmi-1Ps2pkFzL-YQ0ik0Vy7HtvJMWbTunvKvcxFy5kmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110705180620.GC23789@yeeloong.happyleptic.org>
	<CAMT7qiSCqf8ekU5aoY0EXyKGLzsG+DsGt3w1q9RCr5hqWHdoRw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 13:00:13 +0400
Message-ID: <CAMT7qiQXB03nSFOMea=TmPmXDXH+xuXm12HcpJ9QN05JmSDMUg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dmitry Bely <dmitry.bely@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Nested callbacks?

Of course I have found my own bug and nested callbacks work as
expected. Sorry about the noise in the list.

- Dmitry Bely