From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 039BB7EDE3 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:36:43 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of mike.mcclurg@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.160.54; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mike.mcclurg@gmail.com"; x-sender="mike.mcclurg@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of mike.mcclurg@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.54 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.160.54; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mike.mcclurg@gmail.com"; x-sender="mike.mcclurg@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-pb0-f54.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.160.54; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mike.mcclurg@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-pb0-f54.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtkEANdTeFDRVaA2k2dsb2JhbABFhUsBuQ8DfAgjAQEBAQkJCwkUBCOCOQIsARseAxIQXQERAQUBV4dPAQMPmTaCZAkDjCaCdoUAChknDVmIdQEFDIwbgkeDIQOVbY5PFimEEA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,577,1344204000"; d="scan'208";a="177022592" Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com ([209.85.160.54]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 12 Oct 2012 19:36:42 +0200 Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id rp8so3681536pbb.27 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 10:36:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Ye2zC+FI8fk57LXF3KlOZuGtC/J5UOQ2q+FdBT0mrSw=; b=G83x8lOxxg/FyEkMxgUS6kMFbv77JHeiKFuKGjokhrDn8nVHQn0mCRXulzxnn7v+7X SoGs/2n8nYe6COgb5HZmmz3QRdQFjYXgX0WEZByWWXv/9MAdA1Ipy8RPfR7XtwXSrorP 56cAry29DOpN567XHNIz10v7XwEmhv8bHnS8y2AtkQM7B3u33lSoYW6/i2xDv98hL4/k +G8ayQKvpJhWDiCMqsItgZa4QTz8D61XMhu22sjNm42V7DpG7wBT0JctR9qZMG78vclq p/R+L7O2BkLqsQsx3enzqCZEkhVImvN0E7z6IfIUux6tNjlEvRyTXhtHGXvEfQ8oBJ7W sgfA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.224.132 with SMTP id rc4mr15342960pbc.155.1350063400410; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 10:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.124.101 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 10:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 18:36:40 +0100 Message-ID: From: Mike McClurg To: caml-list@inria.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [Caml-list] Generating a module implementation from a module signature using camlp4 Hi list, I am trying to write a bit of camlp4 that will take as input a module signature, preferably in mli form, and generate a module implementation as an ml file. My goal is to implement a mocking framework for OCaml modules. It seems that I would want to use a camlp4 filter to do this, but as far as I can tell it's not possible to create a filter from sig_items to str_items. Is a filter the right approach? Am I going to have to define my module signatures as module type definitions from within ml files? Can anyone give me some some advice on how to do this properly? Mike