From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jianzhou.zh@gmail.com>
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B90687ED26
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 22:24:08 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtYCADKk10/RVdQ2kGdsb2JhbABFpGmQRQgiAQEBAQkJDQcUBCOCMQIsATkDDQUQXRIBBQEiNYdbAwuYK4JgCQOPEYUmJw1KiH4BBQyRLAOVH44ePoFUgkc
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,759,1330902000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="147459740"
Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com ([209.85.212.54])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 12 Jun 2012 22:24:08 +0200
Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so5173479vbm.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id
         :subject:to:content-type;
        bh=XZFWS9lvPQxvM2L3MiYK7LSMicmSHx3g+iDUNWHYmLY=;
        b=tyR4EQ/VUWv+C4dqRvmul6Q7fY4EZZ+9muVFIM+OovKFjgmQsyhODCgXG6bd10tv/e
         uHFentXukxoIWiDKnJEr6op/G96Bvghwu4M4fbjIt9jrx0fD4LL4WySJ9iPXW1w/vCSv
         sSou28hZmw0FgypSfHqpVLG3V+3NCveDk74gJpMo9vw1ZSX8rrBTRMocTIKcDj+Jgdwm
         f5JUZJKiCoYkMCtgK4CEO3cV51ih3E4NexflMjEsLxZYCuB7kJU1vnNtCXDVGZ2/bErB
         ebnG6KazfFfhTofJhGhJvapr0a8aD7oBbZpm9TtNy9/aCpZlx+AXk5dK7anzwOWCnno3
         gHHw==
Received: by 10.220.119.147 with SMTP id z19mr15506233vcq.15.1339532647109;
 Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: jianzhou.zh@gmail.com
Received: by 10.220.75.72 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou@seas.upenn.edu>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:23:46 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: SndtlOXHI4IV-BXvkjVSfknB9zs
Message-ID: <CALhoTJNkkGOM-sR0=O3Z7wHqKM8B9JHsjLr+jWZ8Hjejbg2iow@mail.gmail.com>
To: caml users <caml-list@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: [Caml-list] What is the default hash function of string in 3.12?

Hi,

I have a table (with size > 30000) implemented by both Hashtbl and
Map. I found their performance are almost the same. But I think
Hashtbl should be much faster than Map. So, I was wondering what hash
function of String OCaml 3.12 uses, and if I can define my own.

Thanks!
-- 
Jianzhou