From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAFCD7EC41 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 13:46:40 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of yoriyuki.y@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=74.125.83.54; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="yoriyuki.y@gmail.com"; x-sender="yoriyuki.y@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of yoriyuki.y@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.54 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.125.83.54; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="yoriyuki.y@gmail.com"; x-sender="yoriyuki.y@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-ee0-f54.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=74.125.83.54; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="yoriyuki.y@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-ee0-f54.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlIEAG7gg1BKfVM2k2dsb2JhbABEhU23aoJSA3sIIwEBAQEJCQsJFAQjgjkCLAEbHQEDEhBcAQERAQUBIhMIGodPAQMGCZ0WCQOMKIJ2g3UKGScMAVmIdQEFDIpqgVaGAgOIWItEgVWLKYMvFimEIA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,625,1344204000"; d="scan'208";a="178194567" Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com ([74.125.83.54]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 21 Oct 2012 13:46:14 +0200 Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id c50so938701eek.27 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 04:46:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=t+coBOKjdXb+txar6Ft/RD/wstI2b1tDCnclOYHtji8=; b=aKaEFMlw9lcPQsrO9HVxF/curnU3Vt1gmgsIKEGherd6G/XVuN6nj+7XNeg1jbx1oG NZmeVJJrdXkV/jIwl/UIVEChqs96X+tfM48jz9MLbVmKAUgqf1awVvktz7JDBQRzX1Rv 0IXlmBeZMsbEOP760jEQQvfm+OZa6xohYeANrFECryiNxxiYZUIrfa8qJTy2gwzFsm2x 2hnMvPA7ED+CweLHXDluDgH5qbxVZS/oVpEZYWldRXTNfxLrw0wTioEBPvk2mtpTx8wF KY1wR9vfGvec6mCnjcy2ZawVkQOJlB3WNp9iwIdwd2i1tcqn0xBSgEBsUP+rSi7pKuaz 5cJw== Received: by 10.14.199.134 with SMTP id x6mr8311782een.31.1350819973697; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 04:46:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.0.2 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 04:45:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Yoriyuki Yamagata Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 20:45:53 +0900 Message-ID: To: Ralf Treinen Cc: OCaml mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: custom copies of libraries (was Re: [Caml-list] OCaml Labs) 2012/10/21 Ralf Treinen : > avoiding custom copies of libraries that are published independently, Completely off-topic, but is making custom copies so bad thing? I incline to include third-party's libraries into my libraries unless the library is too big, so that the my libraries are compiled with libraries whose behaviors are tested and guaranteed. If we have a good package management system, things would be a bit different, but still a package management system guarantees only, say, that the version numbers of libraries are higher than XXXX, which does not preclude many problems. -- Yoriyuki Yamagata yoriyuki.y@gmail.com