From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jpathy@fssrv.net>
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 381357FAE1
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 06:35:34 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  jpathy@fssrv.net) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.192.41;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="jpathy@fssrv.net";
  x-sender="jpathy@fssrv.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  jpathy@fssrv.net designates 209.85.192.41 as permitted
  sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.192.41;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="jpathy@fssrv.net";
  x-sender="jpathy@fssrv.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible;
  x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-qg0-f41.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=209.85.192.41;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="jpathy@fssrv.net";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-qg0-f41.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgcFACe4k1TRVcAplGdsb2JhbABahDAEgwFqiBynZZk2BxYBAQEBAREBAQEBBwsLCRIwhCURHQEBOCUPAiYCJBIBBQFXiAqtAj4xij5whGIBBZFsBgqBF45uglKBQYlKjTePfhIjgRWCIB6BcR0xgkMBAQE
X-IPAS-Result: AgcFACe4k1TRVcAplGdsb2JhbABahDAEgwFqiBynZZk2BxYBAQEBAREBAQEBBwsLCRIwhCURHQEBOCUPAiYCJBIBBQFXiAqtAj4xij5whGIBBZFsBgqBF45uglKBQYlKjTePfhIjgRWCIB6BcR0xgkMBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,604,1413237600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="94100614"
Received: from mail-qg0-f41.google.com ([209.85.192.41])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 19 Dec 2014 06:35:33 +0100
Received: by mail-qg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id j5so221919qga.28
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 21:35:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=fssrv.net; s=google;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=e9F7g2KdcPFgjek1WYxl169GRIA4h12zXqfW8aGHcoA=;
        b=M2KpKET++ugulBsfEatoYMoDdhOi+mzXBQGYK3lcKvJskyMrqhABRN7RwSBrfC+Kuq
         TuKeQpMu19BZN5gcCx9tH7z+IW7m+yhbws3HtkWqrt+Ra+JOHo87rEPn3keJ8A+V+/LK
         3JNk5TYt4g6zn99pAJ/DNs+GGdd1vyKDlUUoo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=e9F7g2KdcPFgjek1WYxl169GRIA4h12zXqfW8aGHcoA=;
        b=EvwX0Y0p5iTM0LbaVse7bBhkXL7PGP2/b6tvGfuG0oVTsM5EpV8EdX5jorqvfkaEwI
         LpKbzZ4a/y/tPtEp7Dd8PLUdtXFSPS8kE5NBD4sYP7ZHy/5t6VoIMe+dlJA1YCyQoo0p
         DX2sVXS2kKesFVH4jQmvg+3zWEO3qUp4lja6t6xyb6gcDJLi7eU9KJNb2mtx/lHb0/IB
         b0OmRH0zgRJqt4q6wt9puf9SfjBjdEX+RL/mf7LDjOlhjmeI1xcrZ2VciVnKDrS3T5KF
         kVJisQa3MmTQKsC73ltRQs7sCUUjHeO0JwQWaYvmzh1Ux4VoraaUowCh+YbBo+05Xjku
         Dunw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkNEZdDzwVssSr88AqdLooLzE0oVMO+npLzfrjKntDtZqujbN8AYW4AX3LN+V0ki0WdPs9R
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.122.131 with SMTP id l3mr11010652qar.10.1418967331834;
 Thu, 18 Dec 2014 21:35:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.140.102.53 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 21:35:31 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 21:35:31 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL2Z3DCUjq1o7+mancpR+ttpJkHESNUeFicorK7BpE7qPntyAQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jiten Pathy <jpathy@fssrv.net>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: [Caml-list] fold missing in string/bytes

Any rationale, why the stdlib doesn't have fold on string/bytes?