So is anyone working on accelerating compilation? Has any of these proposals been deemed superior to the others? On Sep 11, 2013 9:24 PM, "Francois Berenger" wrote: > On 09/11/2013 10:46 PM, Wojciech Meyer wrote: > >> What are you trying to prove here? >> > > I am not trying to prove anything. > I just manage to show something, which is the whole point of a good plot. > > > Makefiles will be always faster as > >> mentioned before, however there is still space for vast improvement, the >> biggest elephant here being slow scanning. Patches welcome. >> >> Also, it does not show the convenience of using ocamlbuild, in >> particular dynamic dependency resolver, nice language for specyfing >> complex rules, tags, and VPATH build that just works (does your makefile >> VPATH at all?) >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Francois Berenger > > wrote: >> >> On 9/7/13 5:51 AM, Fabrice Le Fessant wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Romain Bardou >> > wrote: >> >> 3) Parallel compilation in Ocamlbuild >> >> Of course it would help but it is not easy to >> implement so I'm just >> putting it there to be exhaustive. >> >> >> I'm not sure what you are referring to, OCamlBuild does >> already >> support parallel builds. >> >> >> Does it? I actually thought the -j option was ignored. >> >> I just did a quick test and I gain about 5 seconds with -j >> on a 1min15 >> build (I had cleaned, recompiled and recleaned before so >> that caching by >> the file system would not impact the result too much), so it >> does seem >> to be a *little* faster :) >> >> >> FWIW, I recently compiled Merlin with both ocamlbuild and >> ocp-build, >> on a quad-core with "-j 10" for both (the link to the ocp-build >> description file is in the latest OCamlPro's report), ocamlbuild >> needs >> 13s where ocp-build only needs 4s to compile everything. >> >> >> This morning, I played with a Makefile and ocamlbuild >> to build batteries-included from a clean source tree. >> >> The Makefile was provided by Cedric Cellier. >> >> Here follows the wallclock times to build on my eight cores machine. >> >> #You can plot them like this: >> cat < make_Vs_ocamlbuild.data >> #nprocs Makefile ocamlbuild >> 1 14.52 21.43 >> 2 6.84 17.57 >> 3 4.95 16.44 >> 4 4.18 15.95 >> 5 3.70 15.67 >> 6 3.36 15.62 >> 7 3.12 15.54 >> 8 3.03 15.292 >> EOF >> gnuplot -persist <> set title 'make Vs ocamlbuild' >> set xlabel 'nprocs' >> set ylabel 'wallclock time(s)' >> plot 'make_Vs_ocamlbuild.data' u 1:2 w lines title 'time -p make >> fast -j np', \ >> '' u 1:3 w lines title 'ocamlbuild -j np' >> EOF >> >> >> >> -- >> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: >> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/_**_arc/caml-list >> >> > >> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/**__ocaml_beginners >> >> > >> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-**__bugs >> >> > >> >> >> > > -- > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: > https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/**arc/caml-list > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/**ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-**bugs >