From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <refis.thomas@gmail.com>
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1E4D7EEEF
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 17:56:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  refis.thomas@gmail.com) identity=pra;
  client-ip=209.85.212.175;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="refis.thomas@gmail.com";
  x-sender="refis.thomas@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  refis.thomas@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.175 as permitted
  sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.212.175;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="refis.thomas@gmail.com";
  x-sender="refis.thomas@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-wi0-f175.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=209.85.212.175;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="refis.thomas@gmail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-wi0-f175.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DxBQBwL4hVlK/UVdFcgy81XwaDGKochg+MMYcrB0wBAQEBAQESAQEBAQcLCwkfMEEEg14BAQQSER0BGx0BAwwBBQULDwImAgIiAREBBQEcBhMih3cBAxINp30+MYs/gWuCeYp2ChknDVeFBAElAQUOgROKJId1gUMFk32EVoZ4gXuUbBIjgQwJF0mDQD0xAYJHAQEB
X-IPAS-Result: A0DxBQBwL4hVlK/UVdFcgy81XwaDGKochg+MMYcrB0wBAQEBAQESAQEBAQcLCwkfMEEEg14BAQQSER0BGx0BAwwBBQULDwImAgIiAREBBQEcBhMih3cBAxINp30+MYs/gWuCeYp2ChknDVeFBAElAQUOgROKJId1gUMFk32EVoZ4gXuUbBIjgQwJF0mDQD0xAYJHAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,660,1427752800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="137360608"
Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 22 Jun 2015 17:56:16 +0200
Received: by wicgi11 with SMTP id gi11so79843470wic.0;
        Mon, 22 Jun 2015 08:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=ibMLo6qlO94JX3MWdRyDbvGuAvlrQzW45GrEmBmRloA=;
        b=Owh2JxEvvvtCCioYRzf+V4NqnIA8xVx0ovhw3GYZAGF/503S87n/l0yKOv+9HjNI/T
         hBOGHr74yAUepGSkTz2Qkn4VBUXCyhHJJzTLxxi7sGELTvxOQLxbTm7FePgJOThvN9ub
         tEysM4SslddBQmhpXNw7HZrnaDUDuL9Yj0GkKigut7YZNs0/F8TADNM+WL3HXtVkbDeM
         0XQ2TbVmCgI1rahdSNuMIM+O3KkwEEZ9nhvXc0b9C+2RQR0sRJTem46EM03XwAlxp/PA
         s4hGw6jwaMDNy3IejRfiT7EqBnqJ7cRqVkV6/bov4FozF9IztAESN0DmZrNOxMQOaqO/
         xkvw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.94.101 with SMTP id db5mr23825265wjb.91.1434988575996;
 Mon, 22 Jun 2015 08:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: refis.thomas@gmail.com
Received: by 10.180.77.111 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 08:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALGm1Vig7vhXaHP-D0pb4BqhZVA1xUWObJd4Bpd_WGb5XjbVLw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <m2vbefx41k.fsf@charm-ecran.irisa.fr>
	<1434982765.31996.19.camel@e130.lan.sumadev.de>
	<CALGm1Vig7vhXaHP-D0pb4BqhZVA1xUWObJd4Bpd_WGb5XjbVLw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:56:15 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: uIB2Y2lqKdn06KxBwOW7DM4t8KY
Message-ID: <CAJ_epFOeuyvV0pH_DRRd4u9Qair18vZF718Xv=Bg-=m-h7AMzg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Thomas Refis <thomas.refis@gmail.com>
To: Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@inria.fr>
Cc: Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.de>, Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>, 
	OCaml Mailing List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Validation-by: thomas.refis@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] use of ";;" when teaching Ocaml

2015-06-22 16:48 GMT+01:00 Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@inria.fr>:
> Gerd has totally nailed it, and that's the reason why I always use ;;
> in my code.
> If we had another keyword for toplevel let (let without in) the
> situation would be quite different.

http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-camlp4/manual007.html !