From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lukstafi@gmail.com>
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 065B17EE25
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:51:55 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  lukstafi@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=74.125.82.175;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="lukstafi@gmail.com";
  x-sender="lukstafi@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  lukstafi@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted
  sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.125.82.175;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="lukstafi@gmail.com";
  x-sender="lukstafi@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible;
  x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-we0-f175.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=74.125.82.175;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="lukstafi@gmail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-we0-f175.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgcDAEJUcVJKfVKvlGdsb2JhbABZhBPAcwgWDgEBAQEHCwsJEiqCHFABGx4DEggBAgVdAREBBQEiARqHbAEDD5wcjFeDCoQ2ChknDWSJAQEFDJN2A5gKkB0YKYRSOw
X-IPAS-Result: AgcDAEJUcVJKfVKvlGdsb2JhbABZhBPAcwgWDgEBAQEHCwsJEiqCHFABGx4DEggBAgVdAREBBQEiARqHbAEDD5wcjFeDCoQ2ChknDWSJAQEFDJN2A5gKkB0YKYRSOw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,603,1378850400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="39782928"
Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com ([74.125.82.175])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 30 Oct 2013 19:51:39 +0100
Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id t61so1742688wes.34
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=zUIxqKV8kjwIudHZy9f99b4De8h6x0jbvdE7jKw1e4k=;
        b=oUr6tYS9NK533qhZ6xBE9RwVscaZZV5JCjP8KTuxkw4m7q2E1tZlDrfA9vmhxS/Aa9
         hJGd6LcF0NuQ/iiqMzdvuk1LIr1Q3RQJXiSYscQI+sPIzCrtGpjulgW/Vu6qqiKf19xk
         Opr4IGVzYA38IpxiKEi8Jetj522iLRAJ74oj/PnFoa08uhD6O7rhbpWMIP7abUruQOg6
         yn/IX0ZwUGEKBiTex8VJZ+ody9ICk4QTfu9N5kFbD+3icSJw2qWz2LAD9POAdfZmUhyU
         uoIbTuxOw+uWVVVmASHGhsvylk/Ej3jrfPS//2nTM6X6WW0bSlI8kIMRMQY9o1NRtsQW
         z55w==
X-Received: by 10.195.12.39 with SMTP id en7mr6608747wjd.32.1383159114384;
 Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.97.195 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:51:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Lukasz Stafiniak <lukstafi@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:51:34 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJMfKEXbT=g4Ha9=p3aaFtMqAbuhzuYFi5ff8DsrRS6D7hsRyg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Caml <caml-list@inria.fr>, batteries-discuss@lists.forge.ocamlcore.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bfcfde2ae4b6d04e9f9d35a
Subject: [Caml-list] Operator for Lazy.force?


--047d7bfcfde2ae4b6d04e9f9d35a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hello,

Shouldn't we have, in standard libraries, a prefix operator for forcing
lazy values, comparable to `!` for reference cells and `.!` for MetaOCaml's
"run"?

--047d7bfcfde2ae4b6d04e9f9d35a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

<div dir="ltr">Hello,<br><br>Shouldn&#39;t we have, in standard libraries, a prefix operator for forcing lazy values, comparable to `!` for reference cells and `.!` for MetaOCaml&#39;s &quot;run&quot;?<br><br></div>

--047d7bfcfde2ae4b6d04e9f9d35a--